Would post details, but its for a living person!
Ive found a ruby wedding announcement in the paper for a family member, but I can find no record of the marriage 40 years ago on ancestry
Is there anything more I can do?
COMPLETED..Annoying Wedding I cant find
Moderators: grangers14, admin, Northern Lass
- Jimmy
- Posts: 22696
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:40 am
- Primary Surname Interests: Ancestry
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Worcestershire, Staffordshire.
- Location: Kidderminster.
Re: Annoying Wedding I cant find
Its possible that it hasn't been transcribed yet, the only other way is Church records if they married in church.
-
- Posts: 3561
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:23 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Gladders Hackett Shakespeare Allport
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire Durham
- Location: Leicestershire
Re: Annoying Wedding I cant find
Fatman wrote:Would post details, but its for a living person!
Ive found a ruby wedding announcement in the paper for a family member, but I can find no record of the marriage 40 years ago on ancestry
Is there anything more I can do?
Given you presumably know the month and hence the quarter and names you could search the original index -- bearing in mind that they could have been economical with the truth on the year (I have a set that gave a different year as their first born came to fast after the actual wedding.)
-
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:24 am
- Primary Surname Interests: Hall, Gowler
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Cambridgeshire, Dartford
Re: Annoying Wedding I cant find
Hmm ive tried looking for both the first names, in the year and rough area but nothing
Ill have to leave it for now!
Ill have to leave it for now!
- snoopysue
- Posts: 3947
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:12 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Fellows Jinks Wearing Jeavons Jensen Barker Skidmore Beardmore Woodall
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Warwickshire, Denmark
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
Re: Annoying Wedding I cant find
Maths girl wrote:
Given you presumably know the month and hence the quarter and names you could search the original index -- bearing in mind that they could have been economical with the truth on the year (I have a set that gave a different year as their first born came to fast after the actual wedding.)
Do you know when the oldest child was born? You can try looking for the right date, and vary the year, maybe they were married after the birth of the first child or less than nine months before.
My father in laws parents didn't let on they were married a year later than everyone (their kids) thourght until their silver wedding anniversary.
Snoopysue
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
- MarkCDodd
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:55 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Homer, Dodd, Murphy, Cutler, Ford
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Shropshire, Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Yorkshire
Re: Annoying Wedding I cant find
TheGenealogist have completetly re-indexed the marriages and I found plenty that I culdn't via Ancestry and FreeBMD.
Black Holes happen when God divides by zero.
-
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:24 am
- Primary Surname Interests: Hall, Gowler
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Cambridgeshire, Dartford
Re: Annoying Wedding I cant find
havent found this - but can be archived
Andrew
Andrew