peterd wrote:hi juba think you might be looking at the tree wrong did you click on elizabeth dyson thats highlighted in yellow this will show her parents (the exact quotes are just in the notes )
do you have any dob for william and betsy offsprings
Yes I did click on Elizabeth to find George and Mary but I am only peripherally interested in Elizabeth DYSON - it is her brother who is my direct line and I couldn't see that he appears.
william's children - William m Emma TYE 28 Aug 1853 thomas was born 26 Sep 1860 - Thomas m Caroline ALLCOTT 26 Feb 1883 william c 1855 elizabeth c 1862 john c 1867
Elizabeth/betsys children ann c 1860 mary ann c 1864 emily c 1868 john c 1871 letitia c 1854 betsy c 1859 benjamin c 1864
Right might of found something, is this site anything to do with you juba if not it might help but they get no further than 1803 with george but it has his wife down as mary bennett
The only way i can see in poss taking this forward is to get the marriage detials as NL surgested, as the witness may give the only poss clue that currently available
A person should have an opinion on everything, It becomes tact whether you reveal that opinion or not.
Hi all, I have a couple of Dysons on my tree. Maria Eliza Dyson m. John Yates of Cakemore at St Martin's B'ham 30 June 1828. She was b. Oldbury, 1807. Her Mother was also Maria(h) b. Warwickshire about 1780. I don't have any info on the father. Margaret
Thanks for all the suggestions everyone. I have had a really hectic week - sorry for not getting back to you before.
So many suggestions - I will try to follow up on them and let you know. But don't hold your breath as I have very little spare time to do family history these days. I joined because Jan posted a note on a family history list about the tree and I found a DYSON there.
The Charles DYSON with family including FOSTER and a george is interesting but I have no idea whether they will fit anywhere. But Charles was a later family name - one of my grandmother's brothers was a Charles as was his eldest son. Still it's not an unusual name so mustn't read too much into that. Though his youngest son was George so he may well have followed naming patterns. That said - he didn't name any of his sons after his own father or grandfather ....
The Dyson family site is not one I had come across believe it or not - so I have bookmarked it to read at leisure (what leisure!!) - so thanks for that too. I have checked out the George b 1803 on that site and he is definitely mine - I recognise all his descendents and knew some of them!! I shall email the site owner and see if he has any other connections.