Northern Lass wrote:What is the dob for the Elizabeth that marries Lester on other census coming out at?
We have 1803 based on 1851
they marry in 1830 and kids come along 1833 onwards so if she is b 1809 still of the right
age to marry in 1830
Sorry I wasn't clear in my post.
It is Elizabeth snr that worries me.
1841
Richard Raybould 60
Elizabeth ditto 55
--
Lester Holt 30
Elizabeth ditto 25
John ditto 8
William ditto 7
Benjamin ditto 5
Thomas ditto 3
Elizabeth ditto 14
so Richard born 1777-1781 and Elizabeth born 1782-1786
which is not a problem for the birth of Elizabeth jnr but isn't it a bit tricky if they married in 1792 and started producing offspring in 1796?
And I'm sorry I didn't read where you (BlueSavannah) said the baptisms were off Freereg. I think the parents are also William and Elizabeth on Familysearch so two different transcriptions with the same names.
The burial for Richard Raybould in 1845 aged 82 suggests 1763 as birth year which would work fine to marry in 1792. But doesn't fit with the census one born 1777-1781.
Why does nothing ever fit?
