Hi
I had a bit of a reshuffle with the Woodhouses (not quite finished yet).
I detached one branch...this one:
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =357896588
Di, I think that the Thomas baptised at Rowley Regis in 1795 is this one:
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =687663090
so I left the Stonall one unattached. Do you have anything to suggest that he came from Rowley Regis? As you show his birthplace is given in 1851 as Ogley Hay. Would you like to think about the Francis/Hannah option for his parents? And is his wife actually Elizabeth Woodhouse or is she Elizabeth unknown?
Can be archived:Woodhouse-edited
Moderators: Northern Lass, grangers14, admin, peterd
-
gardener
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 6:49 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Rose, Wolloxall, Wallis(ace), Downs
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Netherton, Dudley, Bewdley
- Location: Iceland
- Contact:
Can be archived:Woodhouse-edited
Last edited by gardener on Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The present is the key to the past" - Charles Lyell
-
dianel
- Posts: 3132
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:51 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: PERRY, HARROLD, COOKSEY, HINGLEY, WOODHOUSE, MATEER, RIDDELL, RYAN, LEVETT
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: BLACK COUNTRY, BELFAST, CO. LIMERICK, LANARKSHIRE
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Woodhouse-edited
I agree, Kate, the Thomas 1795 that you have found seems much more likely to have been the son of William & Ann. The wife of Thomas from Shenstone, I have down as Elizabeth "Woodhouse?" in my records. Dunno why I thought so now.
Some mistakes are too much fun
to only make once.
to only make once.