*Archived * -Siviter/Sanders/Parsons

[mumbles]

Whilst inserting some Parsons details I came across a couple of queries/possible connections.
a) Nemo has a Samuel Siviter bornj 1775 RR who married a Lucy Aston
I have a Samuel Siviter born 1775 RR who was son of Judith Parsons b.1740 RR and Richard Siviter born 1740 RR
Children of Nemo's Samuel have same names as siblings of my Samuel. Is it same family ?
b) Powerj has a Rachel Siviter born 1761 RR who married a Joseph Sanders b. 1754 in 1817 yet they had child John in 1799.
I have John & Rachel with same details except marriage at 17/10/1780 RR which looks more correct. Son John is not on my record but a daughter Mary born 1782 Halesowen who married a Joseph Hackett b.1782 on 9/2/1800 Halesowen.
My Rachel Siviter was a daughter of Judith & Richard noted at a) and brother of Samuel b.1775
If this can be sorted I can link the Siviter/Parsons and Sanders records on bcc

[peterd]

you seen this file mumbles

Ancestral File
1. Samuel SIVITER - Ancestral File
Gender: M Birth/Christening: 1775

[peterd]

found this is subbmitted


Rachel Siviter or Civiter

Birth: bapt 17 Jul 1761 Rowley Regis, Staff, England


Parents
Father: Richard Siviter
Mother: Judith Parsons

Marriage(s)
Spouse: Joseph Sanders
Marriage: 27 Sep 1780




this is an extracted version of the marriage it confirms 1780 date


RACHAEL SIVITER
JOSEPH SANDERS
Marriage: 17 OCT 1780 Rowley Regis, Stafford

[powerj]

I agree, my marriage date cannot be correct, I have looked back at my old files and I think it should have been 17/10/1780, happy for you to correct and link where possible.

[mumbles]

I will insert correct details and make links for Rachel Siviter,
I also have parents of Richard who were Joseph Siviter born 1710 RR and Margrait Johnson born 1710 RR.
I believe Samuel born 1775 is brother of Rachel but insufficient validation yet.

[Northern Lass]

Mumbles I have deleted one of the Samuel Siviters and linked the other one in as I agree with you.

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =204992126

So this looks as though it is now sorted and completed
So unless otherwise advised I will move this to archived section within 24 hrs

and nice one mumbles well spotted!