Thisis why you need a Dog...not a Cat

A place for general and off-topic chat amongst researchers. Please ensure that all posts remain suitable for a family audience.

Moderators: admin, Northern Lass, peterd

Post Reply
User avatar
MarkCDodd
Posts: 4157
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:55 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Homer, Dodd, Murphy, Cutler, Ford
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Shropshire, Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Yorkshire

Thisis why you need a Dog...not a Cat

Post by MarkCDodd »

Black Holes happen when God divides by zero.
User avatar
ellie
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 2:29 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Ford, Hollins, Burgess, Birks, Rees,Ball, Coates, Beresford
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire, flintshire Wales
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Thisis why you need a Dog...not a Cat

Post by ellie »

My dogs would leg it and fast! besides I wouldn't want them even attempting to challenge anything that size, far too much of a risk
Ellie
User avatar
snoopysue
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:12 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Fellows Jinks Wearing Jeavons Jensen Barker Skidmore Beardmore Woodall
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Warwickshire, Denmark
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: Thisis why you need a Dog...not a Cat

Post by snoopysue »

Mother in law's chow, would probably have a go at it.... on second thourghts they are sort of related :wink:
Snoopysue

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
User avatar
dianel
Posts: 3132
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:51 pm
Primary Surname Interests: PERRY, HARROLD, COOKSEY, HINGLEY, WOODHOUSE, MATEER, RIDDELL, RYAN, LEVETT
Primary Geographical Research Areas: BLACK COUNTRY, BELFAST, CO. LIMERICK, LANARKSHIRE
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Thisis why you need a Dog...not a Cat

Post by dianel »

snoopysue wrote:Mother in law's chow, would probably have a go at it.... on second thourghts they are sort of related :wink:

Confused, SS!
Who's related, your m-in-law and the chow, or m-in-law and the rats, or the chow and the rats???
Some mistakes are too much fun
to only make once.
User avatar
snoopysue
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:12 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Fellows Jinks Wearing Jeavons Jensen Barker Skidmore Beardmore Woodall
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Warwickshire, Denmark
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: Thisis why you need a Dog...not a Cat

Post by snoopysue »

dianel wrote:
snoopysue wrote:Mother in law's chow, would probably have a go at it.... on second thourghts they are sort of related :wink:

Confused, SS!
Who's related, your m-in-law and the chow, or m-in-law and the rats, or the chow and the rats???


The dog and the rat, definately not the mother in law :wink:
My husband has nicknamed the dog "ratty" :lol:
Snoopysue

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
Post Reply

Return to “The Snug”