brickwalls wrote:That's definitely them in 1891 and 1901, as their daughter Nellie/Helen married my Great Grandfather.
I am a bit confused about him changing where he was born though.
Thanks for the help, I'm much more likely to trust the census returns than the IGI. I just can't fathom how the fathers name is so different on that as what you've found in the census.
Hi
I think what Jimmy has posted all fits together, and fits with the marriage which you have on the IGI.
The marriage you have:
Marriage Date: 26 Apr 1879
Marriage Place: St. John Baptist, Hulme (Near Manchester), Lancashire, England
Groom's Name: George Honey
Groom's Birth Date: 1858
Bride's Name: Mary Williams
Bride's Birth Date: 1856
Groom's Father's Name: George Barnes Honey
Bride's Father's Name: George Williams
that would fit perfectly for this couple in 1881
1881
George HONEY Head M Male 23 Hulme Manchester Builders Clerk
Polly HONEY Wife M Female 24 Newtown, Wales
Alfred HONEY Son U Male 1 Hulme Manchester
And then you are happy with the 1891 and 1901 census. Polly was often a nickname for girls called Mary and her birthplace is consistent as Newtown/Wales.
George Honey is down as:
1881 aged 23 born Hulme Manchester (which is where they were living as well)
1891 aged 32 born Greenwich London (living Chorlton On Medlock Manchester)
1901 aged 42 born Salford Lancashire (living Hulme, Manchester)
It is not unusual to get conflicting information as to birthplace, especially if people moved districts while they were young.
In 1861 Jimmy could only find one George Honey born around 1858 in the Manchester area, and his father was William whereas you are looking for a George Barnes Honey.
It is possible that the George Honey who married Mary Williams was not born in the Manchester area, and he may not even have been there in 1861 or 1871.
So, can we find any George Honey the right age, either with a father George or with a mother only? Possibly in the London area in 1861, or born there but moved?