BURNS Emily PARDOE Thomas Lye, Christ Church Dudley Register Office 011/001/286 1888
Believe Emily was Emily Letitia Burns dau of Benjamin Burns Coal Miner
and Thomas was son of Andrew Pardoe or a John Pardoe
"Complete"Marriage 1888 Christ Church Lye for Mumbles
Moderators: admin, Northern Lass
"Complete"Marriage 1888 Christ Church Lye for Mumbles
Last edited by mumbles on Tue Sep 04, 2018 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Jimmy
- Posts: 22696
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:40 am
- Primary Surname Interests: Ancestry
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Worcestershire, Staffordshire.
- Location: Kidderminster.
Re: Marriage 1888 Christ Church Lye for Mumbles
While you are waiting,
Ancestry.
Thomas Pardoe. 32. father John Pardoe.
Emily Burns. 20. Benjamin Burns.
Marriage Date: 26 Aug 1888.
Marriage Place: Lye, Worcester, England.
FHL Film Number: 1470771.
Reference ID: P143 No286.
Ancestry.
Thomas Pardoe. 32. father John Pardoe.
Emily Burns. 20. Benjamin Burns.
Marriage Date: 26 Aug 1888.
Marriage Place: Lye, Worcester, England.
FHL Film Number: 1470771.
Reference ID: P143 No286.
-
- Posts: 6559
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 3:35 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Hill James Street
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Rowley Regis Quarry Bank Birmingham
Re: Marriage 1888 Christ Church Lye for Mumbles
26 Aug 1888
Thomas PARDOE 32 B Miner The Dock Lye Father John Pardoe Nailer
Emily BURNS 20 S Skelding Lane Lye Father Benjamin Burns Miner
After Banns Both Signed
Wit; William Taylor / Mary Price X

Thomas PARDOE 32 B Miner The Dock Lye Father John Pardoe Nailer
Emily BURNS 20 S Skelding Lane Lye Father Benjamin Burns Miner
After Banns Both Signed
Wit; William Taylor / Mary Price X

“As I learned from growing up, you don’t mess with your grandmother.” — Prince William
"Complete"Re: Marriage 1888 Christ Church Lye for Mumbles
Thanks RF and Jimmy
Most of trees on Ancestry have Andrew Pardoe as father so I am glad I placed for look up as it did not look right
Most of trees on Ancestry have Andrew Pardoe as father so I am glad I placed for look up as it did not look right