Look up done! -Williams/Rudge/Byng

[mumbles]

While inserting Byng info. I found a potential error on bcc :-
Two George Williams are noted who I believe are same person:-
The problem is that only 1871 Census is noted on bcc and shows George as 37 born 1834 but on 1881 Census and 1891 Census he is shown as born 1840.
I have details of family of George Williams to insert and make a connection to Byng family if this can be sorted
and yet again a connection between Linell and my tree
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... onnections
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... onnections

[Northern Lass]

Hi Mumbles I can join those up and delete one of the georges as long as we are uttlery sure that his parents are that george and
caroline andrews

So the george who married phebe has to have this father george

[Northern Lass]

This george with father george is b 1840 ish..

1841 Census Back of Spring Hill Hasbury Halesowen
George 30 Nailer,
Caroline 25,
John 10,
Charles 5,
George 1.

1851 Census Birmingham St., Club Yard, Halesowen
George Williams Head 41 Nailer b. Worcs., Halesowen
Sarah Williams Wife 39 Nailer b. Worcs., Halesowen
John Williams Son 19 Nailer b. Worcs., Halesowen
Charles Williams Son 17 Nailer b. Worcs., Halesowen
George Williams Son 11 Nailer b. Worcs., Halesowen
Thomas Williams Son 1 b. Worcs., Halesowen.

1861 Census Birmingham St., Club Building Yard, Halesowen
George Williams Head 51 Nail Maker b. Worcs., Halesowen
Sarah Williams Wife 49 Nail Maker b. Worcs., Halesowen
George Williams Son 21 Nail Maker b. Worcs., Halesowen
Thomas Williams Son 11 Nail Maker b. Worcs., Halesowen.


need census for the one with phebe

[Northern Lass]

Rite got him on 1881 same place
and his age is b 1840..but we still have to confirm that his father is a george so marriage look up

1881 Birmingham St Halesowen Worcs

George Williams 41 h m nailer?
Phebe Williams 45 wife
Sarah Williams 19 dau un button factory hand
George Williams 10 son scholar
Mary Hodgetts 19 boarder button factory hand
all b Worcs Halesowen

stick it on mumbles and I will add it

Marriage 1865 WILLIAMS George RUDGE Phoebe Halesowen, St John the Baptist Dudley Register Office 014/003/186

if father is George I will link up George son to George father and delete the 1834 one...I will change that dob now to 1840 and add note..
how does that sound?


we have to be so sure of the lines going back but this is great finding links

[mumbles]

Nl,
1881 Census & 1891 Census show George born 1840 and Phoebe born 1836 and and 1834
Phebe age ties up with age before marriage on 1851 Census 18 (born 1833) and 1861 Census 28 (born 1833) not aged 34 and born 1837 shown on 1871 Census.
If you adjust connection I can add Census details and insert rest of info.

[Northern Lass]

rite we need that marriage so I am adding it
in the meantime as is correct will leave the 2 Georges on until proven by marriage that George has father George

so archived pend look up

[mallosa]

I understand what you mean Mumbles regarding 2 George's but, I wouldn't class it as an error.
They are left seperate, until proven otherwise

[Jimmy]

Will this help, extracted.

GEORGE WILLIAMS.
PHOEBE RUDGE.
Marriage, 04 JUN 1865, Halesowen, Worcester.
Husband Age at Marriage, 26.
Wife Age at Marriage, 30.

[Northern Lass]

I think it probably is that George but with these names that are shall we say prevelant in that area it is best
to check and I would have blasted loads of look ups last week
but had flu!



but they will get done!

and if father is George I will be soundin me horn of plenty

[Northern Lass]

Ok look up is on and will report back

[Northern Lass]

Ok done a look up to confirm Father and it is George
so both parts of tree have been joined up here...

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =595829097

So unless anyone wishes to run with more on this I will rearchve shortly