We all know the tradition through history to name the first born of each gender after the parents and of course naming after other family members, but one surprising trend I am starting to see while carrying out transcription work, is that number of babies, especially those who already have a number of siblings, being named the same as one of the family servants.
I just been thinking how common was this practice, as it can not be co-incidence. However maybe it turns out that many people listed as Servants, are family members anyway and just employed as such. Just an interesting observation to mull over.
Victorians. Choosing name for baby.
Moderators: grangers14, admin, Northern Lass
-
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:29 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Heath, Dummer
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Southern England
- Location: Portsmouth
Victorians. Choosing name for baby.
Hit a Brickwall? Have you lost all trace of someone? Do not despair, simply make a note they were abducted by aliens! Don't believe in aliens? No problem, just write them off as having disapeared in a time portal
- SRD
- Posts: 2445
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 5:34 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Hillman
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Sussex
- Location: Wiltshire
- Contact:
Re: Victorians. Choosing name for baby.
Not many of my family had servants so it's not something I'd noticed 

Currently investigating the Hillmans of Sussex.
- snoopysue
- Posts: 3947
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:12 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Fellows Jinks Wearing Jeavons Jensen Barker Skidmore Beardmore Woodall
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Warwickshire, Denmark
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
Re: Victorians. Choosing name for baby.
SRD wrote:Not many of my family had servants so it's not something I'd noticed
same here, although a few did have the odd servant, so I'll keep my eyes peeled.
Snoopysue
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.