Genealogy Forum UK

If you are looking on Ancestry its transcribed as Keary. That one is a solicitor
Jo

hi everyone,ive managed to find william srn myself hes on 1861 cencus as spelt william hare,acgrulteral labourer,wife elizbeth 3 years older,and born 1816 in skirpenbeck,yorkshire. living in east stamford bridge, pocklington with 3 extra children thomas,fanny,ann.does this sond right to you ?

zoenel wrote:hi everyone,ive managed to find william srn myself hes on 1861 cencus as spelt william hare,acgrulteral labourer,wife elizbeth 3 years older,and born 1816 in skirpenbeck,yorkshire. living in east stamford bridge, pocklington with 3 extra children thomas,fanny,ann.does this sond right to you ?

post it if you can ?

zoenel wrote:hi everyone,ive managed to find william srn myself hes on 1861 cencus as spelt william hare,acgrulteral labourer,wife elizbeth 3 years older,and born 1816 in skirpenbeck,yorkshire. living in east stamford bridge, pocklington with 3 extra children thomas,fanny,ann.does this sond right to you ?

There is no image coming for the 1861 census that I can see, but it looks like a different family to me, if this is the same one,

1851. Skirpenbeck, Yorkshire.
William Ayre 32. Ag lab.
Elizabeth Ayre 37.
John Ayre 12. Son.
William Ayre 10. Son.
Ann Ayre 7. Dau.
Ellen Ayre 4. Dau.

All born Skirpenbeck.

1861.
William Hare 45.
Elizabeth Hare 48.
Ann Hare 16.
Fanny Hare 8.
Thomas Hare 4.

Jimmy wrote:1851. Skirpenbeck, Yorkshire.
William Ayre 32. Ag lab.
Elizabeth Ayre 37.
John Ayre 12. Son.
William Ayre 10. Son.
Ann Ayre 7. Dau.
Ellen Ayre 4. Dau.

All born Skirpenbeck.

1861.
Ellen Hair. abt 1845. Skirpenbeck, Yorkshire, England. Servant. Gate Helmsley, Yorkshire. .

thanks jimmy,it maybe the same family, did the ag farmers not move from town to town where the work is? and the birth date would tie in with william jrn.

does it say where william jrn was born?

was that family in elloughton in 1841 cencus or where please help?

sorry forgot to add as my family are definitly on 1841 cencus spelt william hairs aged24,william jr aged 5,and elizabeth wife aged 28. and a joseph child aged 4.ag labour elloughton. im sure the hair spelling family is mine.as william srn may have been born skirpenbeck, and so may his wife,then they could have travelled where the work was moving to balk where william junior was born then onto elloughton where my family were in 1841. then they may have returned back to skirpenbeck,and had the rest of there children. in the mean time my desendent william jrn has moved out and started his own life.what does anyone think of this ,is it possible or am i complately barking up the wrong tree,thanks im sorry i cant up load ancestry as i use the library to do my reasearch so have to type from my notes.

zoenel wrote:Elizabeth is not a ferrer. I do have a birth and marriage certificates for william hairyes josephs brother who is my descendent,it says is father was william hairyes and was an agriujral labourer.and i also know he was born in 1817.and was in elloghton east yorkshire in 1841 cenus.the name is spelt hairs .howvere the missing link is what happened before 1817.which you cant find out off his sons birth certificate, i appreciate your help. but that has to be somebody in there who can trace the family before 1817.im really sorry to be using everyones time here but i dont know what to do.

Are you sure that the 141 census, even though you have a marriage cert it is the right family.

Hi everyone thanks for your earlier help with this project . I have some further information,having checked ancestry libary i have found a burial for a William Hairyes(spelt correclt) at the Holy Trinty Chuch at Rothwell,Leeds. June 13th 1840 aged 40.Could this be William srn?.Could anyone help me find a marriage for him or a birth,thanks