Genealogy Forum UK

Thanks Jimmy.
Thats what I thought and I think this may be them on BCC
http://www.bcconnections.tribalpages.co ... =950848105

A couple of things that dont match though.
Also that christening of Eleanor is earlier than what is on 1841 and Eleanor on census is under Elizabeth.

grangers14 wrote:Not sure?
Is this Elizabeth on BCC?
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... own-Family

Abraham marries a Sarah Rose, is it an error on marriage cert as witness to marriage?

His marriage is 1846.

25th December 1850. Christ Church, Quinton
Benjamin Plant, Of Full Age, W, Miner, Cakemore, John Plant, Miner
Elizabeth Portman, Of Full Age, S, Nailer, Cakemore, Samuel Portman, Factor,
Banns
Benjamin signed. X of Elizabeth
Witnesses:- X of James Jones. X of Sarah Rose

grangers14 wrote:??
1841. Back Lane, Warley Wigon, Oldbury
Sarah Portman, 40, Nailer,
Abraham, 15,
Jane, 13
William, 10,
Elizabeth, 7,
Eleanor, 4
All born in County

Not looking so good now,

1851. Back Lane, Warley Wigorn, Worcestershire.
Sarah Portman 50. Wid. Nailer, Pauper. Warley Wigorn, Worcestershire.
Jane Portman 21. Dau. Warley Wigorn, Worcestershire.
Willm Portman 22. Son. Warley Wigorn, Worcestershire.
Elizth Portman 14. Dau. Warley Wigorn, Worcestershire.
Sarah Hadlington 25. Visitor.
John Mee 21. Vistor.

Hmmmm
Thanks Jimmy

Could Eleanor be wrongly transcribed on 1851 as Elizabbeth. I just feel its the right family.
May be Abrahams marriage will help?

It could be Jo.

Nop his marriage doent help

Looked up by RF
25 Dec 1846 St Thomas Dudley
Abraham Portman ofa bach miner Dudley Samuel Portman deceased labourer
Sarah Rose ofa spinster Dudley Joseph Rose labourer
banns
X both
Wit - X William Bowater X Elizabeth Bowater

I cant do anymore on this just keep getting a dead end.
Archive.
Jo