Page 2 of 3

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 3:01 pm
by mallosa
Carol wrote:Mallosa has kindly sent me the info we found on the Bate/Rollason Marriage
Stanley Bate aged 24 married
Hannah Jane Rollason aged 26
St Pauls Blackheath
August 1924 -date unclear on scan-possibly 12th- I Must have original somwhere



have added this info to connections

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:27 pm
by mallosa
I think most of it is on now, if someone could just check please?

...................here

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 5:16 pm
by Carol
Hi Just looking Mallosa,

Stanley Bate we decided was 1899 not 1900

Joan Bate also seems disconected from parents but not sure how tribal pages displays so perhaps just for appearance

Is anyone able to do one more look up for Mary Bate in previous post to test my theory?

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 5:20 pm
by Carol
John Thomas Bate must be on BCC twice as one added today is not married to Henrietta Tooth. When I added some ages ago I would have started with this marriage so presume this needs connecting up

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 5:27 pm
by Northern Lass
Carol wrote:John Thomas Bate must be on BCC twice as one added today is not married to Henrietta Tooth. When I added some ages ago I would have started with this marriage so presume this needs connecting up


looks ok to me ... that John Bates is one b 1873... son of joseph and ann beddows is that correct
have altered stanleys dob

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 5:28 pm
by Northern Lass
John thomas is there with henrietta and parents Joseph and Mary shepherd...is that correct...

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 5:30 pm
by Northern Lass
Joan bates is there with parents Joe and selina.. and only one joan..

just have another look Carol... off to finish tea and open wine!

:P

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 5:31 pm
by Carol
Yes that is right-are they duplicated? When I followed the Joseph Bate line son of Joseph and Mary, I went back to father Joseph but could not see son John Thomas. Does this make sense?

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 5:33 pm
by Carol
Northern Lass wrote:
Carol wrote:John Thomas Bate must be on BCC twice as one added today is not married to Henrietta Tooth. When I added some ages ago I would have started with this marriage so presume this needs connecting up


looks ok to me ... that John Bates is one b 1873... son of joseph and ann beddows is that correct
have altered stanleys dob



John Thomas Bate is younger brother of Joseph Bate who married Selina and both are sons of Joseph Bate and Mary

The connection I could not see is brothers-Joseph and John Thomas

Have had a look around Tribal Pages-think it is just me knowing how to navigate or not as the case may be- I've just added another spouse Lilly Green for Alfred Bate-date not known

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 5:50 pm
by Northern Lass
Ok they are here...

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =566257688

you have to click on parents to see sibs... does that help?

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 5:56 pm
by Northern Lass
Carol wrote:Yes that is right-are they duplicated? When I followed the Joseph Bate line son of Joseph and Mary, I went back to father Joseph but could not see son John Thomas. Does this make sense?


No not duplicated I have checked
Yes that is correct you will only see his line so to see his bros line you go to parents.. I see what you mean...they are on .look


Here is John Thomas and parents

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =122477155

here is Joseph his bro and parents
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... d=77445944

and here they both are...
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =425708365

so to see all kids of a couple you need to click on the relevant father or mother

ok check any others Carol and let us know...
:wink:

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 6:19 pm
by Carol
Thanks NL-that makes sense now

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 8:25 pm
by Northern Lass
1923
BATE Alfred GREEN Lily Blackheath, St Paul Dudley Register Office 012/007/69

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 8:34 pm
by Northern Lass
This is the only one I can see to an Edwin or Edward but it aint Louis

1927
BATE * Edwin G DETHERIDGE Millicent Blackheath, St Paul Dudley Register Office 012/007/388

you would need to look at the marriage and confirm the name for Edwin as Joseph

:cry:

Re: Bate

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 9:50 pm
by Northern Lass
1927
TROMANS Edward BATE Annie Blackheath, St Paul Dudley Register Office 012/007/393