Page 2 of 3
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:06 pm
by Northern Lass
need the 1841 and 1851 for Samuel to Add to BCC
we can't add Jane until check those census out
can anyone post them pls
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:09 pm
by Northern Lass
so looks like James Betts and Letitia are sibs
and that marriage for Jane Betts dau of James would be niece to Letitia
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:13 pm
by Fatman
Northern Lass wrote:need the 1841 and 1851 for Samuel to Add to BCC
Which Samuel?
born 1818 or 1841?
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:13 pm
by Northern Lass
Samuel snr
presume Samuel jnr on both?
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:18 pm
by Fatman
1851:
Kings Norton, Harborne
Samuel Hall Head 33 abt 1818 Male Staffordshire, England
Letitia Hall Wife 32 abt 1819 Female Staffordshire, England
Samuel Hall Son 9 abt 1842 Male Staffordshire, England
Sarah Hall Daughter 2 abt 1849 Female Staffordshire, England
Hannah Hall Daughter 2 MO abt 1851 Female Staffordshire, England
1841
Kings Norton, Harborne
Samuel Hall 20 abt 1821 Male add Staffordshire England
Lettichen Hall 20 abt 1821 Female add Staffordshire England
Thomas Hall 3 abt 1838 Male add Staffordshire England
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:46 pm
by Northern Lass
Northern Lass wrote:Here you go FS look up done by Rockyfowler
rockyfowler wrote:21 July 1872 St Giles rowley Regis
Samuel HALL 45 W Fitter Smethwick Father Joseph Hall Fitter
Jane BETTS 40 S Smethwick Father James Betts Labourer The Marks of Both
Wit; Job Siviter X Sarah Siviter X
did you get that look up I emailed you too?
I think this is the marriage and he lied about his age
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:59 pm
by Northern Lass
As FS said this could help
the birth cert for Frederick
say you only want it if father for frederick is a Samuel and mother Jane
dont give her maiden name
1871
Roe Buck Street, West Bromwich
Samuel Hall 50 - Fitter
Jane Hall 40
Joseph Hall 14 - Forge man
James Hall 12 - Works in a forge
William Hall 8
Frederick Hall 3
George Hall 8
Ada Hall 8 Months
Emma Hall 17
all b West Bromwich
1868
HALL Frederick Harborne Sandwell Register Office HAR/30/424
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:47 pm
by Fatman
Thanks NL - will order certs!
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 5:28 pm
by Northern Lass
Fatman wrote:Thanks NL - will order certs!
any marriage ones FM just flag as we can prob look those up for you
unless birmingham
you know about the bmsgh site don't you?
which gives you the year and church
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 6:14 pm
by Fatman
i know of the bmsgh but not that particular feature - where on the website is it?
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 6:28 pm
by Northern Lass
Fatman wrote:i know of the bmsgh but not that particular feature - where on the website is it?
ok if you go to the home page here
http://www.bmsgh.org/scroll down
left hand side click on the west midlands one
http://www.westmidlandsbmd.org.uk/then go to green tab marriages
http://www.westmidlandsbmd.org.uk/marriages.phpclick on search marriages on right bottom
http://www.westmidlandsbmd.org.uk/cgi/m ... stmidlandsthen search by name
http://www.westmidlandsbmd.org.uk/cgi/m ... ds#surnamethen put your years in
and name
use soundex if needs be
try it
put in 1872 and Jane betts
you get this
1872
BETTS Jane HALL Samuel Rowley Regis, St Giles Sandwell Register Office 18/4/325
the last numbers ie 325 would be the entry no in the PR for St Giles RR year 1872
so if you were in archives you would be able to go straight to that marriage
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:24 pm
by Fatman
Thanks - that looks helpful
1 question tho, rockyfowler did a lookup, but there werent details of if they were bachelor, spinster etc
Would that not be in the records kooked up? would i need the cert?
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:53 pm
by FarSide
Northern Lass wrote:Northern Lass wrote:Here you go FS look up done by Rockyfowler
rockyfowler wrote:21 July 1872 St Giles rowley Regis
Samuel HALL 45 W Fitter Smethwick Father Joseph Hall Fitter
Jane BETTS 40 S Smethwick Father James Betts Labourer The Marks of Both
Wit; Job Siviter X Sarah Siviter X
did you get that look up I emailed you too?
I think this is the marriage and he lied about his age
Samuel was a Widower and Jane single
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:03 pm
by Fatman
whoops missed that! - Could well be that one then!
Re: This annoying marriage
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:10 pm
by Northern Lass
It's him!! I know it is feel it in me water!!
but the certif for one of the kids will help!
are we done on this pending birth certif for freddie?