Not a member of the Union. Union powers are not what they used to be.
Just found out I can lodge an "Unlawful Termination Dispute" for $67 that will allow Government experts in the legislation to speak to both sides and come up with a recommendation.
If the recommendation is that my employer was unlawfull in the dismissal and refuses to give me my position back, I can then lodge an Unfair Dismissal via the courts with the other side knowing they can't win.
Forcing me to court in such circumstances would almost guarantee that costs would go against my employer.
Basically it come down to this.
1) They fired me saying that narcolpesy prevents me from performing my duties.
Fact is I have been performing the duties for over 8 years, 5 of which I have had narcolepsy.
2) They say the medical report from my Narcolpesy specialist says I can't perform my duties.
In fact, the answer to the question, "Is Mr Dodd able to perform safely the full range of duties on a full time basis?" the answer was "Yes, but not as fast as he used to."
3) They say my long abscences over the last 4 months are proof that narcolpesy stops me from performing my duties.
The fact is that an ongoing chest infection caused by a fungus in my lungs was the cause of the absence, not narcolepsy. This is indicated in the sick leave forms provided by my Doctor.
4) They say the medical information from my Doctors says my condition will get worse.
He said a 12 month cycle of evaluation was required as the condition will degenerate, not that I can't perform my duties right now. Who knows, it might be another 10 years before the narcolpesy starts to interfere.
MarkCDodd wrote:Not a member of the Union. Union powers are not what they used to be.
Just found out I can lodge an "Unlawful Termination Dispute" for $67 that will allow Government experts in the legislation to speak to both sides and come up with a recommendation.
If the recommendation is that my employer was unlawfull in the dismissal and refuses to give me my position back, I can then lodge an Unfair Dismissal via the courts with the other side knowing they can't win.
Forcing me to court in such circumstances would almost guarantee that costs would go against my employer.
Basically it come down to this.
1) They fired me saying that narcolpesy prevents me from performing my duties.
Fact is I have been performing the duties for over 8 years, 5 of which I have had narcolepsy.
2) They say the medical report from my Narcolpesy specialist says I can't perform my duties.
In fact, the answer to the question, "Is Mr Dodd able to perform safely the full range of duties on a full time basis?" the answer was "Yes, but not as fast as he used to."
3) They say my long abscences over the last 4 months are proof that narcolpesy stops me from performing my duties.
The fact is that an ongoing chest infection caused by a fungus in my lungs was the cause of the absence, not narcolepsy. This is indicated in the sick leave forms provided by my Doctor.
4) They say the medical information from my Doctors says my condition will get worse.
He said a 12 month cycle of evaluation was required as the condition will degenerate, not that I can't perform my duties right now. Who knows, it might be another 10 years before the narcolpesy starts to interfere.
Acme refused (I won't name the real company) but agreed to another private hearing where I can claim for Unfair Dismissal as long as there is no order to reinstate me.
I expected this as there would be a queue a mile long to claim unfair dismissal if I won.
So, options were.
1) Go through unfair dismissal via the normal commision which involves legal representatives on each side. That could force them to give me my job back but I risk a lot of money doing it.
2) Go for unlawfull dismissal which involves a lot of legal jargon and strict interpretations of the law. Expensive and scary.
3) Go through the commision and have a private hearing. It is up to either side if they have legal reprentatives and who they subpoena. Win or lose, the side that subpoenas a witness must pay compensation to the witness. Acme have alread decided to subpoena my Narcolepsy Doctor which is perfect for me. He will support my side, not theirs.
Option 3 will cost me nothing and I am 100% sure I will win.