linell wrote:snoopysue wrote:As far as literacy goes my gr gr grandmother was on the 1911 census as Nurse (certified Midwife), the midwife bit adds up with what my nan told me. At some point I suddenly realised that all of the documents I have where she should have signed, there is only her mark.
I did a bit of research into the midwife proffession and at this point in time you couldn't call yourself a midwife let alone practise as one unless you were registered or certified. Some were certified as part of their training and some had to prove to a board that they were competant. It is inconcievable today that a nurse or midwife would be illiterate, but my gr grandmother couldn't even sign her name!
Goodness Sue, mind you things were much more civilised by 1911, after the Education Act which was 1890 something, life did improve, bet your Gt Gt Grandmother was a great Midwife all the same.
Linell.
My mum says she delivered babies for the rich and poor alike, and was well respected. She was apparently a sleepwalker, and the local policeman followed her on occaision to make sure she got home okay. They had thirteen kids, and at one point they and nine kids were all living in a four roomed house! I remember my nan saying she had some sort of disfiguring tumour on her face, when I got the death certificate it mentioned a rodent ulcer (a non spreading, non lethal form of cancer) - it's nice when the records back the stories up!
One thing that annoys me though is that it's only the 1911 census that mentions her occupation, the only one where she's a widow. It's a shame that the wife's occupations weren't recorded more often!! If my gr gr grandfather had lived a little longer (he died in 1910), I might never have been able to prove the family stories.