On a 1861 census entry I've found that one family is down as working as a "Potter At Iron Works Employing 3 Men And 6 Boys". This census doesn't state whether the people were employers or employees, and on the 1851 census he's an iron roller, 1871 he's a roller (image unclear, but could be iron roller), 1881 stocktaker at ironworks (unemployed).
My question is is it likely that he was employing the 3 men and 6 boys, or would he have been one of them?
Census 1861 - occupation
Moderators: grangers14, admin, Northern Lass
- snoopysue
- Posts: 3947
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:12 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Fellows Jinks Wearing Jeavons Jensen Barker Skidmore Beardmore Woodall
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Warwickshire, Denmark
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
Census 1861 - occupation
Snoopysue
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
- Antie Em
- Posts: 4309
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:17 am
- Primary Surname Interests: Salt, Jones, Humphries, Riley, Barklam/Bartlam, Shilvock, Guest
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Halesowen, Dudley, Clent, Tipton, Rowley Regis, Kingswinford, Wall Heath
- Contact:
Re: Census 1861 - occupation
snoopysue wrote:On a 1861 census entry I've found that one family is down as working as a "Potter At Iron Works Employing 3 Men And 6 Boys". This census doesn't state whether the people were employers or employees, and on the 1851 census he's an iron roller, 1871 he's a roller (image unclear, but could be iron roller), 1881 stocktaker at ironworks (unemployed).
My question is is it likely that he was employing the 3 men and 6 boys, or would he have been one of them?
I think he would have been an employer, otherwise I don't think it would have said how many people were working there. He could have hit hard time, or perhaps been injured before 1871.
There's no place like home ......
- gardener
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 6:49 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Rose, Wolloxall, Wallis(ace), Downs
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Netherton, Dudley, Bewdley
- Location: Iceland
- Contact:
Re: Census 1861 - occupation
I would take the opposite view
"Potter at" doesn't suggest that he was the owner. Have you tried looking back and forth a bit to see how neighbours were recorded?

"Potter at" doesn't suggest that he was the owner. Have you tried looking back and forth a bit to see how neighbours were recorded?
"The present is the key to the past" - Charles Lyell
- snoopysue
- Posts: 3947
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:12 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Fellows Jinks Wearing Jeavons Jensen Barker Skidmore Beardmore Woodall
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Warwickshire, Denmark
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
Re: Census 1861 - occupation
In 1861 his neighbours were commercial clerk, railway gate keeper, boiler smith, dress maker, cartsman: in 1871 neighbours were clerk, iron moulder, enginners wife, bricklayer.
That doesn't suggest to me anything other than employee.
I think he may have had plans to better himself. The family moved from Tipton to Yorkshire, and his children must have been reasonably educated - one became a presbytarian minister, a daughter was a music teacher, and another started a music business that employed loads of family members and when he died he left the equivalent of £2 million!
That doesn't suggest to me anything other than employee.
I think he may have had plans to better himself. The family moved from Tipton to Yorkshire, and his children must have been reasonably educated - one became a presbytarian minister, a daughter was a music teacher, and another started a music business that employed loads of family members and when he died he left the equivalent of £2 million!
Snoopysue
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
- SRD
- Posts: 2445
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 5:34 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Hillman
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Sussex
- Location: Wiltshire
- Contact:
Re: Census 1861 - occupation
I think I'm right in thinking that potters were used as pattern makers in foundrys (still are, as are carpenters), whether a pattern maker would own a foundry business would depend on the product. I know an antique restorer who has his own foundry to produce the metal fittings for furniture that are no longer available so I don't see why a small specialist pattern maker may well have started up a business to provide specialist products for, for instance, the pottery industry (think of the hinges on the lids of Toby jugs and German beer steins).
Currently investigating the Hillmans of Sussex.