Parents and relationships

Information on various topics.

Moderators: grangers14, admin, Northern Lass

Post Reply
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 8:10 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Barsham, Bunn, Flexen, Gunns, Mann
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Norfolk, Berks, Bucks, Wilts, Hants, Sussex
Location: Cambridgeshire
Contact:

Parents and relationships

Post by admin »

Bit of an odd question. If your mother was your father's second wife, what is your relationship to your father's first wife? Step child? Ancestry seems to think so, but I've never heard it applied backwards in time, rather than to a later marriage :?: :?
Dominic
Genealogyforum.co.uk webmaster and administrator
peterd
Posts: 15670
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:33 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Dorricott. Watterson. Evans. Bracegirdle. Quinn. Mcloughlin
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Shropshire. Cheshire. Lancashire. Black Country. Co Durham
Location: co durham
Contact:

Re: Parents and relationships

Post by peterd »

i would of thought nothing its only a step parent or step child when your part of the first relationship (child) into the second relationship when partner of his natural parent, that what i think ?
A person should have an opinion on everything, It becomes tact whether you reveal that opinion or not.

http://www.deneview.co.uk/
User avatar
Antie Em
Posts: 4309
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:17 am
Primary Surname Interests: Salt, Jones, Humphries, Riley, Barklam/Bartlam, Shilvock, Guest
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Halesowen, Dudley, Clent, Tipton, Rowley Regis, Kingswinford, Wall Heath
Contact:

Re: Parents and relationships

Post by Antie Em »

admin wrote:Bit of an odd question. If your mother was your father's second wife, what is your relationship to your father's first wife? Step child? Ancestry seems to think so, but I've never heard it applied backwards in time, rather than to a later marriage :?: :?


I would also think "nothing", you can only be a step child if you are taken on by your mother or father's new spouse. From Wiki "The traditional and strictest definition of a “stepfamily” is a married couple where one or both members of the couple have pre-existing children who live with them".
There's no place like home ......
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 8:10 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Barsham, Bunn, Flexen, Gunns, Mann
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Norfolk, Berks, Bucks, Wilts, Hants, Sussex
Location: Cambridgeshire
Contact:

Re: Parents and relationships

Post by admin »

It's strange if so, as a child from the first marriage would obviously be a half-sibling of a child from the later marriage, yet there's no term to define the relationship between the later child and earlier spouse. We have step relationships, half relationships and "blended" families, but nothing to describe what must be a very common scenario these days? A child from the middle marriage is step child of a later spouse, but a "nothing" to the earlier one?
Dominic
Genealogyforum.co.uk webmaster and administrator
User avatar
snoopysue
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:12 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Fellows Jinks Wearing Jeavons Jensen Barker Skidmore Beardmore Woodall
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Warwickshire, Denmark
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: Parents and relationships

Post by snoopysue »

Would a later child have a relationship with an earlier spouse?
Certainly with the people I know who've been married several times and have kids, the later kids have no contact with the earlier spouse even if they have contact with older half siblings. This contact is always through the common parent.

Although my 7 year old nephew thinks that it would be a good idea to take his new half sibling (by his mother) with him when he visits his father, so they can all play together! :grin:
Snoopysue

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
User avatar
Antie Em
Posts: 4309
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:17 am
Primary Surname Interests: Salt, Jones, Humphries, Riley, Barklam/Bartlam, Shilvock, Guest
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Halesowen, Dudley, Clent, Tipton, Rowley Regis, Kingswinford, Wall Heath
Contact:

Re: Parents and relationships

Post by Antie Em »

My son and his wife had two children and split up a few years ago. His ex remarried and they had two children who I love and see often and they think I'm their nanny. Won't ever tell them I'm not - until perhaps when they're grown up. Don't think there's a term for that either, I'm just nanny Maggie
There's no place like home ......
User avatar
gardener
Posts: 3273
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 6:49 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Rose, Wolloxall, Wallis(ace), Downs
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Netherton, Dudley, Bewdley
Location: Iceland
Contact:

Re: Parents and relationships

Post by gardener »

snoopysue wrote:Would a later child have a relationship with an earlier spouse?


A friend of mine invites her husband's first wife to all extended family occasions such as christenings and confirmations. Says that since the woman's children are there it is natural to invite her too. Guess it might depend on how and when the marriage broke up :wink:
"The present is the key to the past" - Charles Lyell
User avatar
snoopysue
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:12 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Fellows Jinks Wearing Jeavons Jensen Barker Skidmore Beardmore Woodall
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Warwickshire, Denmark
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: Parents and relationships

Post by snoopysue »

gardener wrote:
snoopysue wrote:Would a later child have a relationship with an earlier spouse?


A friend of mine invites her husband's first wife to all extended family occasions such as christenings and confirmations. Says that since the woman's children are there it is natural to invite her too. Guess it might depend on how and when the marriage broke up :wink:


I think it's great that a family can get on like that, especially as the "unconventional familes" are fast becoming the norm.
With my sister's ex husband it's not that amicable. He was unfaithful with his first wife and was sneaky enough that my sister didn't catch on - I an understand that wife number one thinks my sister's a witch! He was then unfaithful with his second wife (my sister), when she was pregnant and after the birth. My sister confronted him - he denied it, but she later caught him out in a lie. He claims that the new girlfriend (now wife number three) didn't know he was married at the start. (I would have liked to be a fly on the wall when he asked if he could move in with the girlfriend, explaining the wife, oh and don't forget the 2 month old baby son!!).
When he picks up my nephew, the new wife is never there, sometimes she's deposited at a local supermarket - so my sister has never met her. Maybe the ex is afraid of what my sister could tell her about her husband!! I must say my sister has never acted the injured party and has never used her son as a weapon with her ex (unlike his first wife), and hopefully my nephew will have a balenced view of his parents!
Snoopysue

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
Post Reply

Return to “Miscellaneous”