1871 census - what relation!

Completed discussions and topics. All topics are locked on archive. Please contact a forum moderator if you'd like a thread reactivated.

Moderators: grangers14, admin, Northern Lass

Fatman
Posts: 460
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:24 am
Primary Surname Interests: Hall, Gowler
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Cambridgeshire, Dartford

Re: 1871 census - what relation!

Post by Fatman »

They would have had a lot of children out of marriage though?
FarSide
Posts: 3687
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 1:58 am

Re: 1871 census - what relation!

Post by FarSide »

I'd say 10mths old
Frederick W.Elsden son 10 b. Waltham Abbey
I live in my own little world. But it's ok....they know me here!
Fatman
Posts: 460
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:24 am
Primary Surname Interests: Hall, Gowler
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Cambridgeshire, Dartford

Re: 1871 census - what relation!

Post by Fatman »

Yep - you are right - my maths was wrong!
FarSide
Posts: 3687
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 1:58 am

Re: 1871 census - what relation!

Post by FarSide »

Poss
Births Jun 1890
Elsden Frederick William Edmonton 3a 420

The district Edmonton spans the boundaries of the counties of Essex, Hertfordshire and Middlesex
I live in my own little world. But it's ok....they know me here!
User avatar
Jimmy
Posts: 22696
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:40 am
Primary Surname Interests: Ancestry
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Worcestershire, Staffordshire.
Location: Kidderminster.

Re: 1871 census - what relation!

Post by Jimmy »

The only way to be sure who Fredericks father was would be birth or marriage cert.
Fatman
Posts: 460
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:24 am
Primary Surname Interests: Hall, Gowler
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Cambridgeshire, Dartford

Re: 1871 census - what relation!

Post by Fatman »

Yep thats what I thought! Thanks for all your help everyone!
Locked

Return to “Archived General Discussion”