Standards For Sound Genealogical Research

[TWG1947]

This is reprinted from: http://www.ngsgenealogy.org/

Are you working to it?


Standards For Sound Genealogical Research

Recommended by the National Genealogical Society
Remembering always that they are engaged in a quest for truth, family history researchers
consistently-
* record the source for each item of information they collect.
* test every hypothesis or theory against credible evidence, and reject those that are not
supported by the evidence.
* seek original records, or reproduced images of them when there is reasonable assurance
they have not been altered, as the basis for their research conclusions.
* use compilations, communications and published works, whether paper or electronic,
primarily for their value as guides to locating the original records, or as contributions to the
critical analysis of the evidence discussed in them.
* state something as a fact only when it is supported by convincing evidence, and identify the
evidence when communicating the fact to others.
* limit with words like "probable" or "possible" any statement that is based on less than
convincing evidence, and state the reasons for concluding that it is probable or possible.
* avoid misleading other researchers by either intentionally or carelessly distributing or
publishing inaccurate information.
* state carefully and honestly the results of their own research, and acknowledge all use of
other researchers' work.
* recognize the collegial nature of genealogical research by making their work available to
others through publication, or by placing copies in appropriate libraries or repositories, and
by welcoming critical comment.
* consider with open minds new evidence or the comments of others on their work and the
conclusions they have reached.

[MarkCDodd]

The best advice I ever had was everything is a theory till you have two sources of proof.

[TWG1947]

Absolutely Mark, I totally agree.

Actually this is a prelude to my next posting regarding a marriage in my line posted on the forum, it shows poor research and a complete lack of knowledge of social history of the period.

Its been followed sheepishly by several people too tired to think for themselves.

[grangers14]

Is there a problem with what has been put TWG?
Have you expressed it on the thread or to the people it involved?

I agree with what you put research.

I hope you get things resolved.
Jo

[TWG1947]

Hi Jo,

Actually I've not got a problem with anyone in particular only with opinion, possibles and probables passing as genuine research.
What I was thinking of posting was an example of poor research.

If people are happy filling their family trees with fiction why should I spoil their fun.

As for getting things 'resolved' I thought this was a discussion forum.

Terry

[peterd]

it is a disscusion forum twg, but it not here to embarass anyone if you have a problem with anyone tree in particular and that person is a member of this forum then you contact the person in question about the problem. Peter