Arc -Price

[grangers14]

Have added.
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =313057950
I havent deleted Thomas Grand son in 1891 but as he is as Grand son I dont think he should be there as son

[Northern Lass]

Have added.
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =313057950
I havent deleted Thomas Grand son in 1891 but as he is as Grand son I dont think he should be there as son

who added it Jo?
cos no name on who added it
So as no name if you feel it is incorrect delete it and amend as necessary

[grangers14]

Deleted Thomas.
He must be an older child, child.
Jo

[Jimmy]

Have added.
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =313057950
I havent deleted Thomas Grand son in 1891 but as he is as Grand son I dont think he should be there as son

who added it Jo?
cos no name on who added it
So as no name if you feel it is incorrect delete it and amend as necessary

I added Thomas as a son because he was listed as a son in 1901 census.

[Northern Lass]

Have added.
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =313057950
I havent deleted Thomas Grand son in 1891 but as he is as Grand son I dont think he should be there as son

who added it Jo?
cos no name on who added it
So as no name if you feel it is incorrect delete it and amend as necessary

I added Thomas as a son because he was listed as a son in 1901 census.

Stick yer name on Jimmy if you add ought to BCC then any queries we can discuss it with the person added it
any with no name on I make a decision on

Now are we saying then that there are 2 census one with him on as G.son and one with him as son
I am coming in sideways here

so we need to sort if he is a son or G.son and then add accordingly
can we look at this again guys and decide between us

when decided can we add a note please in notes

[Northern Lass]

1891 Census
66, Fox Oak Street, Rowley Regis
Benjamin Price, head, 55, Chain Maker,
Elizabeth, wife, 55,
John, son, 28, Moulder,
Kate, daur, 25, Cugin(?) Maker
Walter, son, 18, Labourer,
Clara, daur, 13,
Maggie, daur, 7,
Thomas, Grand son, 2
All born Rowley


1901 Census
66, Fox Oak Street, Rowley Regis
Benjamin Price, head, 64, Chain Manufacturer
Elizabeth, wife, 62,
Kate Hodgkiss, daur, m, 29, Chain Manufacturer,
William Hodgkiss, son in law, brick Layer
Maggie Price, daur, 17,
Thomas, son, 11,
George Hodgkiss, Grand son, 6 months
All born Rowley

could it be Kates son?
where is he in 1911
a marriage would give his father
if Benjamin then that sorts it

[Northern Lass]

looks like he is still at fox oak in 1911

First names THOMAS
Last names PRICE
Last names Algorithm Exact
Birth Year 1889
Birth Year +/- 3 years
County Staffordshire
Residence FOXOAK

trying to work out who with

[Northern Lass]

I am putting in just Price then in other people in house the word Thomas and then Foxoak and getting nought
how do I do it Jimmy the cat

[grangers14]

I think it would be unlikely that Elizabeth be his Mum. It would mean she was 53 when she had him. Not impossible but unlikely.

[Northern Lass]

Got him on the 1911
cant tweak how to find the others in houshold normally it comes up
so come on Jimmy who is with him?
you are master tweaker on this

[grangers14]

Should have more coffee first!!!
Hes a Hodkiss, so must be Kate and Williams!
Jo

[Northern Lass]

Should have more coffee first!!!
Hes a Hodkiss, so must be Kate and Williams!
Jo

ha ha

Yes....rite now we need to add him as a Price though I think as that is what he seems to be called?
well on the 1911 he is and that must be him as I searched on an address

we need to know what he is registered as Hodgkiss or Price and add accordingly

[grangers14]

1911
Is showing Thomas Price in Foxoak and is showing William E Hodgkiss, 38, Kate E, 42, Margaret M, 6, and John, 3, in Foxoak too.
May be she had him beofre marriage?

[Northern Lass]

have we got this mariage?


1899
PRICE Kate HODGKISS William Cradley Heath, St Luke Sandwell Register Office 20/3/320

So he is born 1890/89
1889
PRICE Thomas Rowley Regis Sandwell Register Office RR/96/338

1889
HOTCHKISS Thomas Dudley Dudley Register Office DUD/193/472

so he has to be regis surely as a Price
in which case is that him on the 1911
when we put in fox oak
HOUSEHOLD PRICE THOMAS M 1889 22 Dudley Staffordshire

[Northern Lass]

:?
1911
Is showing Thomas Price in Foxoak and is showing William E Hodgkiss, 38, Kate E, 42, Margaret M, 6, and John, 3, in Foxoak too.
May be she had him beofre marriage?

this is good thanks for finding that Jo did you use a credit?
if not how did you do it?

can you add this info Jo please and add the marriage and enter him as a Price as that is what he is on 1911 and must have been regis as that as born way before that marriage

does that sound ok?