*Completed* Samuel Blakeway born 1872 - help please

[mallosa]

The image regarding this family on Ancestry is of a completely different family

1911 England Census
Name: Samuel Blakeway
Street Address: 82 Rowley Village, Rowley Regis, Near Birmingham
Marital Status:Married
Occupation:Pipe Maker
Registration district:Dudley
Registration District Number:371
Sub-registration district:Rowley Regis
ED, institution, or vessel:7
Household schedule number:51
Piece:17355

Samuel Blakeway 38
Fanny Blakeway 38
Arthur Blakeway 18
Albert Blakeway 15
Annie Blakeway 9
Joseph Blakeway 7
Alexander Blakeway 5
Gladys Blakeway 3
Frank Blakeway 1
Ann Horton 59


Is anyone able to view it elsewhere please?

[rockyfowler]

Samuel Pipe Maker --Sanitary Pottery Manufacuturer Worker All Rowley Regis
Fanny marr 12 yrs 7 children born all alive
Arthur Clay Miner Sanitary Pottery Worker
Albert Horse Driver UnderGround --Coal Colliery Company Worker
Joseph
Alexander
Gladys
Frank
Ann Horton Servant
From FMP

[sparkstopper]

1881: 8 Church Road, Rowley Regis
Samuel Blakeway 30 Nailmaker
Sarah Blakeway 32 Nailmaker
Samuel Blakeway 9 Son
Thomas Blakeway 6 Son
Rebecca Blakeway 3 Dau
Sarah Ann Blakeway 3 Dau
Joseph Blakeway 12 Son
(all born Rowley Regis)

think maybe the Joseph Blakeway above was probably
meant to be 12 months!!!! although image does say just 12.

[mallosa]

Thanks both!

The reason for having another look at this is because I think I have made a mistake on BCC

If you have a look at the 2 marriages you will see why

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... way-Family

I now think it's two different Samuel's...your thoughts please?

[peterd]

poss death


Deaths Sep 1898
Blakeway Annie 26 Dudley 6c 17

[peterd]

who does arthur age 2 belong too ?


1911: 8 Church Road, Rowley Regis, Near Birmingham
Samuel Blakeway 61 Head Wid Quarryman, stone Getter
Mary Ann Blakeway 28 Dau Single
Arthur Blakeway 2 Grd Son
(all born Rowley Regis)

[peterd]

poss


Births Jun 1909
BLAKEWAY Arthur Herbert Dudley 6c 20

[peterd]

should get the father from this look up ? unless it mary ann ?


Marriages Jun 1932
Blakeway Arthur H Smart Dudley 6b 1648
Smart Matilda Blakeway Dudley 6b 1648

[mallosa]

added that for a look up Pete, thanks

[mallosa]

should get the father from this look up ? unless it mary ann ?


Marriages Jun 1932
Blakeway Arthur H Smart Dudley 6b 1648
Smart Matilda Blakeway Dudley 6b 1648

Thanks to Rockyfowler, here's the answer....

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... way-Family

[mallosa]

back to Samuel born 1872....

(Looked up by Rockfowler)
Marriage 25 Dec 1892 St Giles Rowley Regis
Samuel BLAKEWAY 20 B Labourer Rowley Regis Father Samuel Blakeway Labourer
Annie KNIGHT 20 S Rowley Regis Father John Knight Labourer
Wit; Thomas Blakeway Louisa Woodhouse

Poss Death Sep Qtr 1898
Blakeway Annie 26 Dudley 6c 17

(looked up by Rockyfowler)
Marriage: 24 March 1900 Holy Trinity Old Hill
Samuel Blakeway 27 bach labourer Rowely Samuel Blakeway labourer
Fanny Horton 27 spinster Rowley no father on certif
both sign
Wit- Benjamin Smith / Mercy Sherwood

So do we think that info is an error, or is it a different couple?

[peterd]

I think cert wrong s there a death for annie

[mallosa]

So you think it's the same Samuel Pete but should have stated 'Widower'?

[peterd]

i think it should be widower but if he not thought about his first mar with his wife being dead, he is single as such, as well as widower,

[mallosa]

O'k Pete, I'll leave it as it is unless someone knows different