Hi
I have a problem looking this 1911 census up on ancestry, it doesn't seem to exist, but Findmypast has it, but I don't, can anyone help thanks
Household SIMMONDS, Esther 1855 56 F Stourbridge Worcestershire
1901 Census
RG13/2751/60 page 7 sch 49, Long Lane, Hill, Worcs
Samuel Simmons, Head, Mar, 45, Navvy, Stourbridge, Worcs
Esther Simmons, Wife, Mar, 46, Halesowen, Worcs
4 children Gertrude 14, Eliza 11, Esther 9 and Samuel 6
Census 1911 Esther Simmonds "COMPLETED"
Moderators: Northern Lass, grangers14, admin, peterd
- corner_shop
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 7:11 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Southall
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: rowley regis, blackheath
- Location: Droitwich, Worcestershire
- Contact:
Census 1911 Esther Simmonds "COMPLETED"
Last edited by corner_shop on Sun Dec 16, 2012 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Maths girl
- Posts: 3561
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:23 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Gladders Hackett Shakespeare Allport
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire Durham
- Location: Leicestershire
Re: Census 1911 Esther Simmonds
Hi
Having gone the long way round I think I have found the image on ancestry
Go to 1911
Go to Browse Individual records
then drop down menus to
Worcestershire
Hill
18
then type in page 118 at top of transcript
I still haven't found how it has been transcribed but ...
HTH
Maths girl
Having gone the long way round I think I have found the image on ancestry
Go to 1911
Go to Browse Individual records
then drop down menus to
Worcestershire
Hill
18
then type in page 118 at top of transcript
I still haven't found how it has been transcribed but ...
HTH
Maths girl
- corner_shop
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 7:11 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Southall
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: rowley regis, blackheath
- Location: Droitwich, Worcestershire
- Contact:
Re: Census 1911 Esther Simmonds "COMPLETED"
Thanks for your help MG I would never have thought of that, from this example I have learnt that Ancestry havn't transcibed every single record and this is one they missed. There dosn't appear to be any source numbers by the image so must have missed others also.
best regards
best regards