*Completed with Thanks* - Baptisms - St John Halesowen

[Antie Em]

I have found these children on IGI, but because there are two Elizabeth's baptised very close to each other, I think they may be two families - they are all children of William and Mary

Does anyone have transcripts please ?

1. JOHN HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Christening: 11 JAN 1818 Halesowen, Worcester, England

2. SARAH HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 17 FEB 1822 Halesowen, Worcester, England

4. HANNAH HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 13 FEB 1820 Halesowen, Worcester, England

5. ELIZABETH HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 05 MAR 1826 Halesowen, Worcester, England

6. ELIZABETH HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 26 MAR 1826 Halesowen, Worcester, England

7. HENRY HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Christening: 11 JAN 1818 Halesowen, Worcester, England

8. EDWARD HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Christening: 22 FEB 1824 Halesowen, Worcester, England

9. GEORGE HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Christening: 11 JAN 1818 Halesowen, Worcester, England

Many thanks, Maggie

[gardener]

I have found these children on IGI, but because there are two Elizabeth's baptised very close to each other, I think they may be two families - they are all children of William and Mary

Does anyone have transcripts please ?

1. JOHN HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Christening: 11 JAN 1818 Halesowen, Worcester, England
John so William and Mary Hall, Warley Wigorn, nailer, said to be 6 years old
George so William and Mary Hall, warley Wigorn, nailer, said to be 3 years old
Henry so William and Mary Hall, Warley Wigorn, nailer

All done together it seems

2. SARAH HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 17 FEB 1822 Halesowen, Worcester, England
Sarah dau William and Mary Hall, Wharley, nailer

4. HANNAH HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 13 FEB 1820 Halesowen, Worcester, England
Hannah dau William and Mary Hall, Warley Wigorn. nailer

5. ELIZABETH HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 05 MAR 1826 Halesowen, Worcester, England
Elizabeth dau William and Mary Hall, Warley, nailer

6. ELIZABETH HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 26 MAR 1826 Halesowen, Worcester, England
Elizabeth dau William and Mary Hall, Wharley, nailer

7. HENRY HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Christening: 11 JAN 1818 Halesowen, Worcester, England
see no. 1

8. EDWARD HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Christening: 22 FEB 1824 Halesowen, Worcester, England
Edward so William and Mary Hall, Warley, nailer

9. GEORGE HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Christening: 11 JAN 1818 Halesowen, Worcester, England
see no. 1

Many thanks, Maggie

Does that help at all? The two Elizabeths were the same vicar too.

[Maths girl]

I have found these children on IGI, but because there are two Elizabeth's baptised very close to each other, I think they may be two families - they are all children of William and Mary

5. ELIZABETH HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 05 MAR 1826 Halesowen, Worcester, England
Elizabeth dau William and Mary Hall, Warley, nailer

6. ELIZABETH HALL - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 26 MAR 1826 Halesowen, Worcester, England
Elizabeth dau William and Mary Hall, Wharley, nailer


Many thanks, Maggie

Does that help at all? The two Elizabeths were the same vicar too.

Just thought --- have you got the originals or Transcripts gardener ? sometimes if a baby was not expected to live they were given a quick baptism in private -- sometimes in their own home to make sure it was done and the vicars then put a p or private by it and then presuming the baby lived they had a public one later -- both were therefore recorded! -- so could be the same Elizabeth!

[gardener]

Just the transcripts, I'm afraid.
they should not have had two baptisms even if one was done privately. They might have ha da private baptism and then received the baby into the church later.
It looks like one family doesn't it? With kids every couple of years?
Perhaps the original records will supply the answer

[Antie Em]

Thanks MG and Gardener - does look like the same family then

Maggie

[Antie Em]

All added to BCC - can be archived