Genealogy Forum UK

Does he exist? Is he Joseph Hall's father?
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... all-Family

Bit of a muddle that family isnt it?
It also needs changing the census that is there to the head of household.

For Mary Ann...

1881. 64 hackett Street, Rowley Regis
John Hill, head, W, 42, labourer at stone quarry
/Emma Westwood, Mar, lodger, 52, Nailer, Warley Wgigorn
James, son, 18, Labourer at stone quarry, Halesowen
Mary Ann, daur, 22, nailer, Halesowen
Joseph, son, 16, labourer at quarry
Eliozabeth, daur, 12,
John, son, 8,
Alfred, son, 4 months
All others born Rowley Regis

Sorry that census is all there!
Have changed the other census over to head of household now

Could this be them in 1861
Cocksheds Lane Hill
John Hill Head Mar 25 Stone Miner Born Colton Warwickshire
Emma Hill Wife Mar 32 Nailer Born Cawsway Green
Mary Ann Hill Daur 1 Born Hill
Elizabeth Hill Daur 10 MO Born Hill

Rob wrote:Does he exist? Is he Joseph Hall's father?
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... all-Family

Do you think this may mean Joseph (Deseased) and it may be this Joseph here : http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =661865579

He seems to be the only Joseph Hall from Warley in 1881.

Theres this one
1881. Halesowen Street, Rowley Regis
John Bateman, head, 52, Coal Miner, Preston Lancashire?
Elizabeth, wife, 54, Warley?
Elizabeth, daur, 24, ? worc
Eliza, daur, 18, ? worc
Joseph hall, Grandson, 17, Coal Miner, Warley
James Hall, grandson, 13, Min? laneWorc
John hall, grandson, 8,
Joseph Hall, 4,
Hannah bateman, grand daur, 2,
Albert, grandson, 2,
All others born Rowley Regis

Could this be Joseph in 1871
Could explain fathers name:

1871 Blackheath, Rowley Regis.
Mary A. HALL hd. Unmarr. 27 Nailmaker b. Worcs.Wighorn,Salop
JOSEPH HALL son 7 b.Worcs.Wighorn, Salop.
Alice HALL dau. 3 mth. b. Halesowen.

sparkstopper wrote:Could this be Joseph in 1871
Could explain fathers name:

1871 Blackheath, Rowley Regis.
Mary A. HALL hd. Unmarr. 27 Nailmaker b. Worcs.Wighorn,Salop
JOSEPH HALL son 7 b.Worcs.Wighorn, Salop.
Alice HALL dau. 3 mth. b. Halesowen.

This seems likely - part of the same family - Is this Mary Ann here : http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =461707609 - would be William's G Grandson

Just had another look at the census I have added here - http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =740621260

and perhaps Mary Ann is the daur of Edward and Eliza - Any thoughts

Does look like same family:
1861 Private, Warley,Warley,Salop.
William Hall hd. Widwr: 78 Ag.Lab. b. Halesowen.
Christopher Chambers son in law.39 Collier b.Warley
Hann ah Chambers dau.40 b.Warley.
MARY A HALL G/dau.17 Nailer b. Warley
Joseph Hall son 52 Lab. b.Warley.

Yes Sparks - it is the same family - on BCC here : http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =303198581

Maggie

Antie Em wrote:

Rob wrote:Does he exist? Is he Joseph Hall's father?
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... all-Family

Do you think this may mean Joseph (Deseased) and it may be this Joseph here : http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =661865579

He seems to be the only Joseph Hall from Warley in 1881.

I reckon you're right Antie Em!!

Well NL read it as Deason when it could have been deceased.
Have you still got the look up NL?

Rob wrote:Well NL read it as Deason when it could have been deceased.
Have you still got the look up NL?

no you would need to look it up
I am pretty sure it was that
or similar dont think it was deceased it is normally the full name then deceased
or
just word deceased

so we need to leave as is until proved

So do i have to go to the archives?
I mean shall i post it again as a look up?