Page 1 of 4

UPDATE..............Frederick WESTON 1864:COMPLETED.

Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 6:05 pm
by sparkstopper
Just added Frederick WESTON b.1864 Old Hill.
Here:
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... ton-Family
Frederick may already be on BCC...son of Ephraim
WESTON 1842. Can anyone find 1st marriage to Mary Jane b.1862 Rowley.
He marries 2nd wife Lilian in Dud.Reg.Off. so can't be looked up.
Think this good enough to connect?????

Ephraim:
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... onnections

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 6:16 pm
by Northern Lass
trouble is there are a few

West Midlands Birth indexes for the years: 1863
Surname Forename(s) Sub-District Registers At Reference
WESTON Frederick Rowley Regis Sandwell Register Office RR/36/436

West Midlands Birth indexes for the years: 1864
Surname Forename(s) Sub-District Registers At Reference
WESTON Frederick Stourbridge Dudley Register Office STO/044/339

Do we know that that Frederick with father Ephraim married Mary J and Lilian

any census

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 6:35 pm
by sparkstopper
Just checked 1881 census: Frederick (son of Ephraim)
down as a Coalminer.....Will leave unconnected, but still
looking for a marriage to Mary Jane..

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:06 am
by Northern Lass
Where is Frederick in earlier census pls

and where is the other one?

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 11:10 am
by Jimmy
There is only one Frederick I can see, in 1881 he is a coal miner with the same family.
1871. Peartree St, Rowley Regis.
James Jackson 23. Coal miner.
Hannah Jackson 30.
James Jackson 16. Son.
Fredrick Weston 7. Son.
Samuel Weston 5. Son.
William Weston 3. Son.

All born Rowley Regis.

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 11:18 am
by Northern Lass
so that is son of Ephraim as Hannah marries James Jackson

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... i=85346375

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 11:21 am
by Northern Lass
1901 Census: 71 Waggon St.Rowley Regis.
Frederick WESTON hd. 37 Publican b. Old Hill.
Mary Jane WESTON wife 39 b. Rowley Regis.

1911 Census:Blue Ball Inn,Pear Tree Lane, Old Hill.
Frederick WESTON hd. 48 Licensed Victualler b. Rowley Regis.
Lilian WESTON wife 25 marr: 1 yr. b. Dudley.
Elizabeth Davies serv.25 Gen.Serv. b. Cradley.
Florence May Whitcombe serv.14 Gen.Serv. b. Woodside, Worcs.
1 child born. 1 child died.

what was that child called that died

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 11:24 am
by Northern Lass
where is frederick in 1891?

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 11:34 am
by Northern Lass
this looks like Mary Janes death

Deaths Sep 1908
WESTON Mary Jane 46 Dudley 6c 10

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 11:42 am
by sparkstopper
Northern Lass wrote:this looks like Mary Janes death

Deaths Sep 1908
WESTON Mary Jane 46 Dudley 6c 10


There is a photo of gravestone in the forum file 'Weston'
confirming this. Can't find anything in 1891, all other
details in links above.
Really need marriage for Mary Jane.....

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 11:47 am
by Jimmy
Northern Lass wrote:where is frederick in 1891?


I can't see him, or a first marriage.

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 12:01 pm
by Northern Lass
annoying this is

:(

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 12:04 pm
by Northern Lass
There is a Fred Weston marriage in 1881 but cant see it on disc

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 12:14 pm
by Northern Lass
can we work out her dob

if she dies aged 46 25 Sep 1908 Rowley Regis.

could this be her

June 1862
WESTON Mary Jane Dudley 6c 88

maybe that is why no marriage

Re: Frederick WESTON 1864

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 12:35 pm
by sparkstopper
Northern Lass wrote:can we work out her dob

if she dies aged 46 25 Sep 1908 Rowley Regis.

could this be her

June 1862
WESTON Mary Jane Dudley 6c 88

maybe that is why no marriage


Certainly looks like her: Do you think they were brother and sister
NOT man & wife ????

It's certainly unusual to have both wives names on a headstone !!!! :roll: