Page 1 of 2
COMPLETED......................John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:21 am
by Northern Lass
Can we find him on census with dau Fanny pls
need a dob for him and to see if he is on BCC
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =922239240
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:44 am
by sparkstopper
There is this one:
1851 Birmingham St. Halesowen
Mary Godson hd. wid. 57 Letter Carrier b. Northfield.
Sarah HACKETT dau. m. 26 Nailer
JOHN HACKETT son in law 32 Nailer
Ann Higgs dau. m. 20 Nailer
Hannah Godson dau. 15 Nailer
Thomas Godson son 11 Schol.
George HACKETT G/son 9 Schol.
FANNY HACKETT G/dau. 4 Schol.
Myra HACKETT G/dau.2
Jane Gunner lodger wid. 85 Ret.Publican
All others born Halesowen.
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:49 am
by sparkstopper
There is this in the same street.
(They could be duplicated,Fanny & Myra).
1851 Birmingham St. Halesowen
James White hd. wid 50 Bricklayer
Fanny HACKETT lodger 5
Myra HACKETT lodger 2
All born Halesowen.
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:58 am
by Jimmy
1861. Yorks Yard, Birmingham St, Halesowen.
Samuel Bayliss 34. Labourer.
Sarah Bayliss 36.
Fanny Hackett 14. Dau.
Myra Hackett 12. Dau.
Emma Hackett 9. Dau.
Emma Sawyer 15. Niece.
All born Halesowen.
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:02 am
by Jimmy
Not on Wmbmd.
Marriages Mar 1861.
Bayliss Samuel. Stourbridge. 6c. 179.
Cheshire John . Stourbridge. 6c. 179.
Hackett Sarah. Stourbridge. 6c. 179.
Whitehouse Emma. Stourbridge. 6c. 179.
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:24 am
by Jimmy
sparkstopper wrote:There is this one:
1851 Birmingham St. Halesowen
Mary Godson hd. wid. 57 Letter Carrier b. Northfield.
Sarah HACKETT dau. m. 26 Nailer
JOHN HACKETT son in law 32 Nailer
Ann Higgs dau. m. 20 Nailer
Hannah Godson dau. 15 Nailer
Thomas Godson son 11 Schol.
George HACKETT G/son 9 Schol.
FANNY HACKETT G/dau. 4 Schol.
Myra HACKETT G/dau.2
Jane Gunner lodger wid. 85 Ret.Publican
All others born Halesowen.
We have been here before,
viewtopic.php?f=31&t=8353&hilit=hacketthttp://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =244734154http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... ett-Family
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:21 pm
by Northern Lass
excellent am connecting now
1849
Surname Forename(s) Surname Forename(s) Church / Register Office Registers At Reference
GODSON Ann HIGGS George Dudley, St Thomas Dudley Register Office 204/009/295
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:26 pm
by Northern Lass
Jimmy wrote:1861. Yorks Yard, Birmingham St, Halesowen.
Samuel Bayliss 34. Labourer.
Sarah Bayliss 36.
Fanny Hackett 14. Dau.
Myra Hackett 12. Dau.
Emma Hackett 9. Dau.
Emma Sawyer 15. Niece.
All born Halesowen.
So JOhn must die
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:28 pm
by Northern Lass
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:30 pm
by Northern Lass
I think it is that samuel
who does emma sawyer belong to
Samuels mother is a sawyer
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:32 pm
by Northern Lass
EMMA SAWYER
Christening: 13 DEC 1845 Halesowen, Worcester,
Parents:
Father: ZACHARIAH SAWYER
Mother: SARAH Extracted
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... onnections
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:35 pm
by Northern Lass
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:40 pm
by rockyfowler
8 Jul 1849 St thomas Dudley
George HIGGS 21 B Nailer Dudley Wood Father John Higgs Jobbing Smith
Ann GODSON 19 S Dudley Wood Father Thomas Godson Labourer
After Banns The Marks of Both
Wit; William Bayliss Mary Bayliss x
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:44 pm
by Northern Lass
rite need some help pls figuring this out cos losing it
can I connect this Samuel on bcc up to Sarah hackett nee walters
are Phoebe sawyer and william sibs?
Where is Samuel bayliss pre 1861 any census pls
Re: John Hackett
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:01 pm
by Northern Lass
rockyfowler wrote:8 Jul 1849 St thomas Dudley
George HIGGS 21 B Nailer Dudley Wood Father John Higgs Jobbing Smith
Ann GODSON 19 S Dudley Wood Father Thomas Godson Labourer
After Banns The Marks of Both
Wit; William Bayliss Mary Bayliss x
thanks RF
drowning a bit with this
want to connect up samuel
think correct one
need him pre marriage in 1861
