ARC TBC...............Marriage Records

Archived and completed military topics.

Moderators: Northern Lass, admin

Locked
Tosh
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:51 am
Primary Surname Interests: Braithwaite Hutchinson Astley Govier
Primary Geographical Research Areas: West London Cardiff Lancashire Cumberland

ARC TBC...............Marriage Records

Post by Tosh »

Grandfather was in the R.A. in the C19.
On his records it says, "Married without leave" 8th June 1878.
"Brought on married roll" 23rd JUly 1880
I can make random guesses as to the meaning of these expressions but does anyone have a definite answer as to the meaning?
Tosh
Maths girl
Posts: 3561
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:23 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Gladders Hackett Shakespeare Allport
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire Durham
Location: Leicestershire

Re: Marriage Records

Post by Maths girl »

Tosh wrote:Grandfather was in the R.A. in the C19.
On his records it says, "Married without leave" 8th June 1878.
"Brought on married roll" 23rd JUly 1880
I can make random guesses as to the meaning of these expressions but does anyone have a definite answer as to the meaning?
Tosh


I don't know for certain but I seem to remember that you needed permission to get married when you are in the forces -- don't know whether that is still true today -- so presumably -- In 1878 he got married without permission and had to wait until 1880 before his marriage was acknowledged with the rights that would have been given to his wife -- eg receiving some of his pay etc.
User avatar
snoopysue
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:12 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Fellows Jinks Wearing Jeavons Jensen Barker Skidmore Beardmore Woodall
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Warwickshire, Denmark
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: Marriage Records

Post by snoopysue »

Maths girl wrote:
Tosh wrote:Grandfather was in the R.A. in the C19.
On his records it says, "Married without leave" 8th June 1878.
"Brought on married roll" 23rd JUly 1880
I can make random guesses as to the meaning of these expressions but does anyone have a definite answer as to the meaning?
Tosh


I don't know for certain but I seem to remember that you needed permission to get married when you are in the forces -- don't know whether that is still true today -- so presumably -- In 1878 he got married without permission and had to wait until 1880 before his marriage was acknowledged with the rights that would have been given to his wife -- eg receiving some of his pay etc.


I think you do still need permission, I know they run a security check on the future spouse. This at least was the case when my sister was married (about 1990), they checked her out even though she was in the TA and had a higher security clearance than spouses need!
Snoopysue

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
User avatar
MarkCDodd
Posts: 4157
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:55 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Homer, Dodd, Murphy, Cutler, Ford
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Shropshire, Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Yorkshire

Re: Marriage Records

Post by MarkCDodd »

"Brought on married roll" is often referred to as "taken on strength".

Until she appears on the marriage roll the Armed forces will not pay for her accommodation, medical or moving expenses.

i.e. If your Grandfather was posted elswhere before she appeared on the roll, the cost of transport to the new location and accomodation when she reached there would have to be paid by your grandparents.

Whilst she was not on the roll she would not be able to stay with your Grandfather on any military base that might provide married accomodation.

It is good they wrote that on his record as quite often only the "Married without leave" is noted and you would have to troll through the regimental marriage rolls, part of the muster books, at Kew to find if she was ever "taken on strength".
Black Holes happen when God divides by zero.
User avatar
snoopysue
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:12 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Fellows Jinks Wearing Jeavons Jensen Barker Skidmore Beardmore Woodall
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Warwickshire, Denmark
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: Marriage Records

Post by snoopysue »

MarkCDodd wrote:"Brought on married roll" is often referred to as "taken on strength".

Until she appears on the marriage roll the Armed forces will not pay for her accommodation, medical or moving expenses.

i.e. If your Grandfather was posted elswhere before she appeared on the roll, the cost of transport to the new location and accomodation when she reached there would have to be paid by your grandparents.

Whilst she was not on the roll she would not be able to stay with your Grandfather on any military base that might provide married accomodation.
It is good they wrote that on his record as quite often only the "Married without leave" is noted and you would have to troll through the regimental marriage rolls, part of the muster books, at Kew to find if she was ever "taken on strength".


This is still the case today! Wives are even down under their husbands name at the military bases medical center. If you're married, there is a limit as to how long guests can stay in army accomodation (usually only married quarters) to ensure that the army doesn't end up providing for a large extended family.
Snoopysue

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
Maths girl
Posts: 3561
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:23 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Gladders Hackett Shakespeare Allport
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire Durham
Location: Leicestershire

Re: Marriage Records

Post by Maths girl »

I have just read that you had to be 26 to be married in the army -- so was he under 26 and then she was accepted when he got to 26?
Tosh
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:51 am
Primary Surname Interests: Braithwaite Hutchinson Astley Govier
Primary Geographical Research Areas: West London Cardiff Lancashire Cumberland

Re: Marriage Records

Post by Tosh »

Thanks everyone for all the information a good result to my first post.
MathsGirl can you let me the reference for the information about not getting married until 26. I'm an old scientist at heart and love to have printed proof! Sad!
Tosh
User avatar
snoopysue
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:12 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Fellows Jinks Wearing Jeavons Jensen Barker Skidmore Beardmore Woodall
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Warwickshire, Denmark
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: Marriage Records

Post by snoopysue »

Tosh wrote:Thanks everyone for all the information a good result to my first post.
MathsGirl can you let me the reference for the information about not getting married until 26. I'm an old scientist at heart and love to have printed proof! Sad!
Tosh


That'a a cardinal rule for genealogists, proof proof proof, otherwise you end up going up the garden path!
Snoopysue

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
User avatar
MarkCDodd
Posts: 4157
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:55 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Homer, Dodd, Murphy, Cutler, Ford
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Shropshire, Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Yorkshire

Re: Marriage Records

Post by MarkCDodd »

I like going up the garden path. That is where the fairies live!
Black Holes happen when God divides by zero.
Maths girl
Posts: 3561
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:23 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Gladders Hackett Shakespeare Allport
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire Durham
Location: Leicestershire

Re: Marriage Records

Post by Maths girl »

Tosh wrote:Thanks everyone for all the information a good result to my first post.
MathsGirl can you let me the reference for the information about not getting married until 26. I'm an old scientist at heart and love to have printed proof! Sad!
Tosh


Where I read it which might not be what you would call "proof" was as a side comment in the "expert's" reply to the top question on Page 81 of the February 2011 issue of Family Tree magazine.
User avatar
Northern Lass
Posts: 46036
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:12 am
Primary Surname Interests: Hinett, Rose, Round, Shakespear, Wilkins,
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Black Country, Wiltshire, Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: Marriage Records

Post by Northern Lass »

flagging to archive this now if completed
Locked

Return to “Archived Topics”