Genealogy Forum UK

I think we have a connection...not sure which parents for John though.....

there is this John Hackett son of Benjamin and Esther Danks
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =422072640

is he the father of the John Hackett on BCC here
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =712971385

1841
Garrats Lane
John Hackett 44 - Nail m
Sarah Hackett 40
James Hackett 18
Ruth Hackett 17
John Hackett 12
Shadroch Hackett 11
Levi Hackett 7
Ephram Hackett 5
Rosanna Hackett 3
John Hackett 30 - Nail m - does look like he`s living at the same addy---note by Jan I think it looks like aged 80 on image could it be his father?


On the actual image it looks like John Hackett aged 80 to me not aged 30 living with them

Or....and this could connect Joseph b abt 1770 and that John aged 80
both families living next to each other in Garratts lane in 1841)

is this Johns Parents

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =382635445

Northern Lass wrote:I think we have a connection...not sure which parents for John though.....

there is this John Hackett son of Benjamin and Esther Danks
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =422072640

is he the father of the John Hackett on BCC here
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =712971385

1841
Garrats Lane
John Hackett 44 - Nail m
Sarah Hackett 40
James Hackett 18
Ruth Hackett 17
John Hackett 12
Shadroch Hackett 11
Levi Hackett 7
Ephram Hackett 5
Rosanna Hackett 3
John Hackett 30 - Nail m - does look like he`s living at the same addy---note by Jan I think it looks like aged 80 on image could it be his father?
On the actual image it looks like John Hackett aged 80 to me not aged 30 living with them

I've just looked at image and agree it looks more like 80 years , if you look at the age 30's further down the page they are different to the 80 one.

Annie

Its Definitely 80.

Northern Lass wrote:Or....and this could connect Joseph b abt 1770 and that John aged 80
both families living next to each other in Garratts lane in 1841)

are these Johns Parents

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =382635445

I wonder if this could be linked up then
the age is good
area is good
John living next door to Joseph whose age would fit with that bapt for a Joseph

what do we think
I can put my name in notes and a reasoning why linked
then my head on block if incorrect

not sure on this one at all

Jimmy wrote:Its Definitely 80.

John Hackett.
Burial Date. 23 Jun 1843.
Burial Place. Dudley, County Of Worcester.
Age 80.
Birth Date 1763.

rite so that would fit that bapt

that swings it a bit

and Joseph aged 70 in 1841 could be the one bapt 1766?

I personally have made the link, but I wasn't totally sure so have not made it on BCC. I favour Benjamin and Esther (Danks) as parents, merely because John was birth ties in with the marriage date????? Other than that, I can't really say.

I think that Joseph on the 1841 census is Josephus christened 6th July 1772 s of Thomas and Nancy.
The is a burial on FamilySearch Pilot - 22nd Dec 1850 at Rowley Regis, aged 79
Possible marriage to Mary Stokes, 5th Aug 1792 at Kingswinford.


Chris

hmmm ok thanks Chris

I am going to leave it I am just not sure

going to flag this now to archive it
thanks all