Genealogy Forum UK

Can we find a marriage pls and her maiden name
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =365640973

Can't see a marriage at all!

Ive been looking and not found anything.
Wonder if its mistranscribed or they didnt marry?
Jo

West Midlands Death 1888.
TUSKIN Henry, Rowley Regis, Sandwell Register Office, RR/47/355.

Deaths Sep 1888.
Tuskin Henry. 54. Dudley. 6c. 11.

off BCC

1871 census
Rg10 piece 2885 Folio 84
Queen Street

Tustin Henry Head 34 Worcs
Tustin Ann Wife 29 Warks
Malcome Elizabeth Fleming visitor 15 Warks
Tustin Hannah daugt 8 Worcs
Tustin Sarah A daugt 5 Worcs
Tustin William H son 2 Worcs
Tustin Fanny daugt 0 Worcs

1871
Queen Street, Rowley
Henry Tustin 34 - Fishmonger - b Tardebigg
Ann Tustin 29 - b Studley
Elizabeth Flemming Malcorne 15 - b Alcester
Hannah Tustin 8 - b Dudley
Sarah A Tustin 5
William H Tustin 2
Fanny Tustin 3 months
others b Halesowen


On the image looks to me like the visitor is Elizabeth Malcome Hemming, could possibly be Ann's sister or daug

The ages are all over the place, but there's this marriage

Marriages Sep 1846
Hemming Ann Birmingham 16 376
Tustin Henry Birmingham 16 376

Looks like Tustin on the image
1861
Dudley wood, Dudley
Henry Suster 27 - Miner - b Bromsgrove
Ann Suster 26 - Goveness & teacher of 26 children - b Studley
Elizabeth Hemming 5 - daug in law - b Alvester

Got to wonder about that 1846 marriage.. area is right tho
This looks like Henry on the 51, unmarried living with a farmer

1851
Holyoaks farm, Webheath
Benjamin Whoeldon 36
Eliza Whoeldon 36
Elizabeth Whoeldon 11
Joseph Whoeldon 5
Mazin Palmer 15
Joseph Hopkins 23
Henry Tustin 17 - Cowman - b Tardebigg
Thomas Blakeman 14
James J Wollen 16

Added some of this
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =293199378

the ages are all over the place as you say
does he live with 2 different Anns both born Studly
or is her age just wrong!

if he is coming out about 1834 ish then that 1846 is too early
and he is single in 1851
unless it is Ann Hemming but another Henry Tustin-cousin ?
I don't know

FarSide wrote:Looks like Tustin on the image
1861
Dudley wood, Dudley
Henry Suster 27 - Miner - b Bromsgrove
Ann Suster 26 - Goveness & teacher of 26 children - b Studley
Elizabeth Hemming 5 - daug in law - b Alvester.

Alcester on image.

There seems to be a name missing from this,
Dau Elizabeth Hemming born Alcester.

Marriages Dec 1859.
Ainge Mary Ann. Alcester 6d 901.
Clarke William. Alcester 6d 901.
Gittus Mary Ann. Alcester 6d 901.
Hemming Ann. Alcester 6d 901.
Key Edward. Alcester 6d 901.

Checking the 1861. it seems William Clarke and Edward Key could have both married Mary Ann's.

Marriages Dec 1859.
Ainge Mary Ann. Alcester 6d 901.
Clarke William. Alcester 6d 901.
Gittus Mary Ann. Alcester 6d 901.
Hemming Ann. Alcester 6d 901.
Key Edward. Alcester 6d 901.

So can we find the other name?
using vol no etc?

I have tried, Its possible the name as been missed of the index, I am slowing going through 119 images (under T) to see if I can see him, but if he is mispelt I might not find him.

Jimmy wrote:I have tried, Its possible the name as been missed of the index, I am slowing going through 119 images (under T) to see if I can see him, but if he is mispelt I might not find him.

Come on Jimmy you find anything!

Could these 2 Ann's for Dec 1859 be the same

Marriages Dec 1859
Gee John Alcester 6d 911
Hemming Ann Alcester 6d 911
Ingram Joseph Alcester 6d 911
Price Mary Ann Alcester 6d 911



Hemming Ann Alcester 6d 901
Hemming Ann Alcester 6d 911 (just noticed off to the side there's no little pic of glasses 'no scan')

Lost the plot on this one guys

what can I add in notes as a possible marriage...ought or nought?