Genealogy Forum UK

The following from the register extracts appears to be a family

Baptisms

21/05/1709 Elizabeth d of John & Mary Hackett
07/01/1712 Mary d of John & Mary Ackit
01/12/1712 John s of John & Mary Ackit
04/04/1715 Joseph s of John & Mary Hackit
13/06/1717 Anne d of John & Mary Ackit
01/02/1718 Benjamin s of John & Mary Ackit
20/12/1719 Hannah d of John & Mary Ackit

see http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tribe/browse?userid=bcconnections&view=0&pid=56671&rand=948926947 (the last 4 children not added/connected yet.)

My feeling is that Joseph (1715) is the same as Joseph(1710) - see http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tribe/browse?userid=bcconnections&view=0&pid=6757&rand=585283968.

Comments would be appreciated on whether you think the connection should be made or rather create a Joseph (1715) and note possible connection under both enrtries.

Thanks.

Comments would be appreciated on whether you think the connection should be made or rather create a Joseph (1715) and note possible connection under both enrtries.

I don't see the 1710 Joseph but do see the Joseph bap 4 Apr 1715.
There's this Mary
Bap
7 Jan 1711
Mary, d of John & Mary Ackit

Bur
11 Jan 1711
Mary, d of John Ackit

This looks like Mary
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =990454686

Tried to group the families together, hope it's not too confusing..

Poss marriages and kids

04/04/1715 Joseph s of John & Mary Hackit

Marriage - 16 May 1733 - John Hackitt & Hannah Burrows

Baps (seem very close together poss 2 lots of Joseph & Hannah)
27 Jan 1733/4 - John, s of Joseph & Hannah Hackett
4 May 1735 - Mary, d of Joseph & Hannah Hackitt
16 Jan 1736 - Anne, d of Joseph & Hanna Hackitt
25 Mar 1739 - Susannah, d of Joseph & Hannah Hackitt - Bur 22 Apr 1742 Susannah, d of Joseph Hackitt
29 Dec 1740 - Betty, d of Joseph & Hannah Hackitt
23 Jan 1743 - Joseph, s of Joseph & Hannah Hackitt - Bur 11 Jan 1747 Joseph, s of Joseph Hackitt, (R) Aged 4 yrs
14 Apr 1745 - William, s of Joseph & Hannah Hackitt
8 Jan 1747 - Thomas, s of Joseph & Hannah Hackitt
26 Nov 1749 - Joseph, s of Joseph & Hannah Hackitt

Should have checked BCC first the above Baps on BCC already..

20/12/1719 Hannah d of John & Mary Ackit

Marriage - 15 Aug 1736 - John Freeman & Hannah Hackitt

01/12/1712 John s of John & Mary Ackit

Marriage - 23 Aug 1736 - John Hackitt & Mary Windzer
Bur - 16 Jun 1749 - John Hackitt, P Aged 36yrs

Baps
24 Oct 1736 - Benjamin, s of John & Mary Hackitt
6 May 1736 - Nancy, d of John & Mary Hackitt
21 Feb 1742 - Benjamin, s of John & Mary Hackitt
28 Oct 1744 - Mary, d of John & Mary Hackitt
11 May 1747 - John, s of John & Mary Hackitt - Bur 20 Nov 1750 - John, s of Mary Hackitt, Wid, P aged 3&1/2yrs
1 Oct 1749 - Josiah, s of John Hackitt, late deceased, by Mary, his wife

13/06/1717 Anne d of John & Mary Ackit

Marriage - 1 Jan 1740 - Thomas Windsor & Anne Hackitt, both of this parish

Anne Hackitt on BCC
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... onnections

I've all the above info, thanks. The question was whether the connection of the Josephs should be made.

I think we connect up Joseph ( I have amended the date)
I will do that Chris and will put that I have connected

can you add any other info ie the other kids for John and Mary

also do we connect up Anne

the only thing that concerns me is the different spelling of surname which can
mean in the PR 2 different families

Ok connected up Joseph with note

is there any more info in PR for wits on this marriage pls

Marriage - 1 Jan 1740 - Thomas Windsor & Anne Hackitt, both of this parish

Also any wits on the Joseph and Hannah marriage pls

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =509631875

Unfortunately no witnesses

Ok thanks FS
not sure on that Anne maybe just add a note for her

Thanks for connecting Joseph. Looking at all the register entries it looks as if the various spellings (Hacket/Ackit/Hackit/Hackitt/Hackett) are fairly consistent for a particular period and may be the version favoured by the vicar/curate of the time. At time, of course, most people wouldn't be able to read or write.
There is also the following marriage:-

1736 Aug 23 John Hackitt & Mary Windzer [Windsor] - likely to be sister of Thomas Windsor who married Anne. No Witnesses.

I'm inclined to link Anne as well, with a similar note to Joseph

Okedoke go for it then
as you say add a note to notes

nice one!

OK, I've done that.

Thanks for that

This now looks Completed

A bit more here.

Joseph's Daughter Mary (1735) http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tribe/browse?userid=bcconnections&view=0&pid=6761&rand=811950900 I believe married Thomas Jones (1736) http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tribe/browse?userid=bcconnections&view=0&pid=708&rand=726617570 - same witnesses as brother John Hackett's marriage on the same day (14th Sep 1755). I think we can safely merge the 2 Mary's, but I have no idea how to, so one for NL I think.

chrisg wrote:A bit more here.

Joseph's Daughter Mary (1735) http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tribe/browse?userid=bcconnections&view=0&pid=6761&rand=811950900 I believe married Thomas Jones (1736) http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tribe/browse?userid=bcconnections&view=0&pid=708&rand=726617570 - same witnesses as brother John Hackett's marriage on the same day (14th Sep 1755). I think we can safely merge the 2 Mary's, but I have no idea how to, so one for NL I think.

Come on you dont get off that easily
have a go at doing it

Ok you need to change the mary on the marriage to surname test
then you can find it easily

then you need to find her father and where it says add dau find that one test and add her
if you stuck bell me