Genealogy Forum UK

CAn we find an accurate dob for him pls
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =678449399

1851.
Joseph Lea 36. Nailer. Clent.
Ann Lea 27. Rowley Regis.
Edward Lea 17.
Martha Lea 14.
Joseph Lea 10.
Ann Lea 8.
David Lea 6.
James Lea 4.
Henry Lea 2.
William Price 7. Son in law. born Kidderminster.

All others born Hasbury.

Possible second marriage.
JOSEPH LEA.
ANN PRICE.
Marriage: 31 MAY 1846. Halesowen, Worcester.

MARTHA LEA
Christening, 14 AUG 1836, Halesowen, Worcester,
Parents:
JOSEPH LEA.
ANN.

1841. Halesowen.
Joseph Lea 25.
Ann Lea 23.
Edward Lea 7.
Martha Lea 14. 4 on image.
Richard Lea 2.
Joseph Lea 4 Mo.

1841 Hasbury
Joseph Lea 25 Nailer Not Born in County
Ann Lea 23
Edward Lea 7
Martha Lea 14 Image says 4
Richard Lea 2
Joseph Lea 4 Mo
All others born in County
Next Door
Richard Lea 30 Nailer not born in county
Martha Lead 25
Henry Smith 20
Both born in County

1851 Spring Hill Hasbury
Joseph Lea Head 36 Nailer Born Clent
Ann Lea Wife 27 Nailer Born Rowley Regis
Edward Lea Son 17 Nailer Born Hasbury
Martha Lea Daur. 14 Nailer Born Hasbury
Joseph Lea Son 10 Nailer Born Hasbury
Ann Lea Daur. 8 Born Hasbury
David Lea Son 6 Born Hasbury
James Lea Son 4 Born Hasbury
Henry Lea Son 2 Born Hasbury
William Price Son in Law 7 Born Kidderminster

From Parish reg
14 Aug 1836
Martha do Joseph and Ann Lea, Hasbury, Nailer

Possible marriage
25 Dec 1832
Joseph Lea X otp bach
Ann Smith X otp spin
Wit: Richard Lea X Martha Lea X
Banns

Extracted from IGI
RICHARD LEA
Marriages:
Spouse: MARTHA SMITH
Marriage: 11 SEP 1832 Saint Thomas, Dudley, Worcester, England

Flagging for help adding this lot

need to sort out which kids are to whom etc

I'm happy to have a go.

Chris

IGI has christenings at Halesowen for:-

Edward - 19 Aug 1833
Martha - 14 Aug 1836 (confirmed from register by kdw)
Joseph - 21 Feb 1841
Ann(e) - 28 Jan 1843
David - 27 Apr 1845

There are also entries for:-
Richard - 21 Oct 1838
Sarah - 28 Jul 1840 - possible death q3 1840
LEA Sarah Halesowen Dudley Register Office HAL/002/18
Charles - 25 Mar 1846

Has anyone got easy access to check these christenings?

The 1851 Son in law William Price (7) looks a bit odd; I wouldn't think that Joseph was old enough.

Thanks, Chris

Jimmy wrote:1851.
Joseph Lea 36. Nailer. Clent.
Ann Lea 27. Rowley Regis.
Edward Lea 17.
Martha Lea 14.
Joseph Lea 10.
Ann Lea 8.
David Lea 6.
James Lea 4.
Henry Lea 2.
William Price 7. Son in law. born Kidderminster.

All others born Hasbury.

Do you mean this one.

Jimmy wrote:Possible second marriage.
JOSEPH LEA.
ANN PRICE.
Marriage: 31 MAY 1846. Halesowen, Worcester.

This fits with this,
WILLIAM PRICE.
Christening: 16 JUL 1843, Kidderminster, Worcester.

Mother: ANNE PRICE.

Thanks for offering to add this Chris
if you can add the link when you have done that would be great

so those bapts can be looked up at archives
or if anyone has the transcribed records up to .....not sure what they are up to.

so is David Joseph and Anns (his second wife)
and William price must be Anns from her marriage to an Unknown Price?
so she needs to be entered as Ann Unknown

and we need that marriage looked up on 1846 see if she is a widow

so can someone add that pls and I will add it to look ups

Looks like Ann as remarried.
1861.
James Sidaway 44. Halesowen.
Ann Sidaway 38. Rowley Regis.
William Price 17. Wife Son In Law (Ambiguous) Kidderminster.
James Price 14. Lea on image. Wife Son In Law (Ambiguous) Hasbury.
Henry Lea 12. Wife Son In Law (Ambiguous)
Ann Lea 18. Boarder. Hasbury.
Sarah Lea 9. Wifes Dau. Hasbury.

JAMES SIDAWAY.
ANN LEE OR PRICE.
Marriage, 08 AUG 1858, Saint Thomas, Dudley, Worcester.

So, what we're saying here is that William Price should probably have been listed as step-son or wife's son ( perhaps son in law was the proper term in 1851 ).
I think from the IGI record that William was illegitimate, so Anne Price would still be a spinster on the 1846 marriage.

There is a possible death for Ann Lea in Q1 1846 Stourbidge. So that would fit.

There is also a possible death for Joseph Q4 1851.

If those and the re-marriage is good then the 1861 census looks possible.

NL, shall I go with these assumptions?

Chris

Yes I think so
Jimmy what do you think?

put Ann in as Ann Price his second wife
first wife Ann Smith

Ann Price has a William put his father as Unknown Unknown and estimate a dob
that will be ok

what Have I missed