Page 1 of 1

*Arc tbc* --Nancy or Ann Dingley

Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 5:58 pm
by Northern Lass
I have rec'd a birth cert for Joseph Mole
it tells us that mother is indeed Ann Dingley or Nancy Dingley
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =543361510

now on the marriage to Samuel Mole she is Nancy Dingley
SAMUEL MOLE. NANCY DINGLEY. Marriage, 26 JUN 1836. Saint Thomas, Dudley, Worcester

but is she on BCC already
here...as Ann Dingley b 1807
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =828955791

or here as Nancy Dingley b 1810
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =725774585

or here as Nancy Dingley b 1812
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =725774585

can we find her on later census and pin down her dob

Re: Nancy or Ann Dingley

Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:17 pm
by kdw
1861 Black Heath Rowley Regis
Ann Mole Head Widow 49 Nail Maker abt 1812
Thomas Mole Son 21 Nail Maker
John Mole Son 18 Nail Maker
Samuel Mole Son 13 Nail Maker
Joseph Mole Son 10
All Born Rowley Regis

1871 Rowley Road Blackheath
Ann Mole Head W. 58 Nailo Maker abt 1813
John Mole Son 25 Rivet Maker
Samuel Mole Son 23 Rivet Maker
Joseph Mole Son 20 Rivet Maker
All born Rowley

1881 55 Birmingham Road
Ann Mole Head W 66 Nail Maker abt 1815
John Mole Son Unm 36 Rivet Maker
Joseph Mole Son Mar. 30 Rivet Maker
Getha Mole Daur in law 28 Nail Maker
Eliza Mole Grand daur. 9 Scholar
Joseph Mole Son 7 Scholar
William Mole Grandson 5
Alfred Mole Grandson 1 mth
All born Rowley

Re: Nancy or Ann Dingley

Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:20 pm
by Northern Lass
anyone fancy adding those census pls
:grin:

Re: Nancy or Ann Dingley

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:03 am
by dianel
Northern Lass wrote:I have rec'd a birth cert for Joseph Mole
it tells us that mother is indeed Ann Dingley or Nancy Dingley
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =543361510

now on the marriage to Samuel Mole she is Nancy Dingley
SAMUEL MOLE. NANCY DINGLEY. Marriage, 26 JUN 1836. Saint Thomas, Dudley, Worcester

but is she on BCC already
here...as Ann Dingley b 1807
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =828955791

or here as Nancy Dingley b 1810
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =725774585

or here as Nancy Dingley b 1812
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =725774585

can we find her on later census and pin down her dob


All these 3 are born Halesowen, but Ann Mole on all census from 1841 on is said to be born Staffordshire & Rowley Regis. I know they sometimes put the wrong birthplace, but this is very consistent.

Re: Nancy or Ann Dingley

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:33 am
by Northern Lass
dianel wrote:
Northern Lass wrote:I have rec'd a birth cert for Joseph Mole
it tells us that mother is indeed Ann Dingley or Nancy Dingley
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =543361510

now on the marriage to Samuel Mole she is Nancy Dingley
SAMUEL MOLE. NANCY DINGLEY. Marriage, 26 JUN 1836. Saint Thomas, Dudley, Worcester

but is she on BCC already
here...as Ann Dingley b 1807
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =828955791

or here as Nancy Dingley b 1810
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =725774585

or here as Nancy Dingley b 1812
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =725774585

can we find her on later census and pin down her dob


All these 3 are born Halesowen, but Ann Mole on all census from 1841 on is said to be born Staffordshire & Rowley Regis. I know they sometimes put the wrong birthplace, but this is very consistent.


I know what you mean but it is only where bapt and they did walk huge distances.
I do find that living in Rowley they bapt Halesowen on the look ups I do.

But I can't be sure
The Nancy 1812 one at Halesowen may have some more info like living in Rowley Regis as abode
I find that quite a bit...so ....does anyone have the disc handy pls

see if on the 1812 Nancy one all the info please

Re: Nancy or Ann Dingley

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:27 am
by Northern Lass
rite lin kindly looked this one up for me no more info ....1813 we get more info on the printed registers
although sometimes you get lucky and the vicar adds more juicy notes....not this time

so I am going to have to leave it....aggghhh

so unless anyone else has any suggestions this will be moved to archived