Page 1 of 1

Richard Poole b1842

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 7:04 pm
by mallosa
Thanks for the look up NL :wink:
I have added to Connections, also his parents Richard and Selina here

24 Feb 1884 St Thomas Dudley
Richard Poole 20 bach- mason- dudley-
Richard Poole - mason
Phebe Rollason- 21- spinster-dudley-
thomas rollason miner
banns
X both
wit- John Wallow? / Ann Wallow?

I wonder if the surname of witnesses is Dallow?


Can't find a marriage for Richard and Selina :?

Re: Richard Poole b1842

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:58 am
by kdw
Hi
Colud Selina be Selina Lowe as Richard and Selina are living next door to Edward and Lucy Lowe in 1871

Marriages Dec 1864
HORTON Walter John Stourbridge 6c 308
Lowe Selina Stourbridge 6c 308
PRICE Anne Stourbridge 6c 308
PUGH Richard Stourbridge 6c 308

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =853682129

Re: Richard Poole b1842

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:07 am
by dianel
I was wondering this, kdw, when I saw this:

1861
At Black Heath
Edward Lowe Head 26 Nail Maker b. Staffs., Rowley Regis
Lucy Lowe Wife 34 Nail Maker b. Staffs., Rowley Regis
Selina Lowe Daur 14 Nail Maker b. Staffs., Rowley Regis
Benjamin Lowe Son 12 Nail Maker b. Staffs., Rowley Regis
James Lowe Son 8 Scholar b. Staffs., Rowley Regis
Thomas Lowe Son 3 b. Staffs., Rowley Regis
Hannah Lowe Daur under 1 Mo b. Staffs., Rowley Regis

So you think Richard's surname was mistranscribed as 'Pugh'?

Re: Richard Poole b1842

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:13 am
by kdw
Only way to be sure is to have marriage checked, certainly looks like it and the ages fit

Re: Richard Poole b1842

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:23 am
by mallosa
Could well be kdw!
Thanks for that :wink:

Re: Richard Poole b1842

Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:17 am
by Northern Lass
What are we doing on this one Mally?
is look up down?
archive pend look up?
or more info needed?

Re: Richard Poole b1842

Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:31 pm
by mallosa
kdw wrote:Hi
Colud Selina be Selina Lowe as Richard and Selina are living next door to Edward and Lucy Lowe in 1871

Marriages Dec 1864
HORTON Walter John Stourbridge 6c 308
Lowe Selina Stourbridge 6c 308
PRICE Anne Stourbridge 6c 308
PUGH Richard Stourbridge 6c 308

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =853682129


Don't know which Church :?

Re: Richard Poole b1842

Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:13 pm
by mallosa
kdw wrote:Hi
Colud Selina be Selina Lowe as Richard and Selina are living next door to Edward and Lucy Lowe in 1871

Marriages Dec 1864
HORTON Walter John Stourbridge 6c 308
Lowe Selina Stourbridge 6c 308
PRICE Anne Stourbridge 6c 308
PUGH Richard Stourbridge 6c 308

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =853682129


Yes kdw, found them! Here they are.....

1871: Blackheath, Rowley Regis, Staffs
Richard Poole 26 Head Mason
Selina Poole 24 Wife

Richard Poole 6 Son
Charles Poole 3 Son
Sarah J Poole 1 Dau
all born Rowley Regis

next door:

Edward Lowe 45 Nailmaker
Lucy Lowe 43 Wife Nailmaker
James Lowe 17 Nailmaker
Thomas Lowe 11
Hannah Lowe 9
Joseph Lowe 4

Re: Richard Poole b1842

Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:30 pm
by mallosa
1881: 51 Hackett Street, Rowley Regis, Staffs
Richard Poole 39 Head Bricklayer
Selena Poole 34 Wife

Charles Poole 13 Son Rivet Maker
Sarah J. Poole 10 Dau
John Poole 9 Son
Hannah Poole 5 Dau
Edward Poole 3 Son
Richard Poole 15 Son Bricklayers Lab
all born Rowley Regis

Edward and Lucy Lowe are living at No 49

1891: Hayes Road, Hill, Worc
Richard Poole 48 Head Bricklayer Halesowen
Selina Poole 46 Wife Oldbury, Worc

Sarah J Poole 20 Dau S Nailer Oldbury, Worc
Edward Poole 14 Son Oldbury, Worc
Arthur Poole 9/12 Gr.Son Halesowen

Re: Richard Poole b1842

Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:09 pm
by mallosa
kdw wrote:Hi
Colud Selina be Selina Lowe as Richard and Selina are living next door to Edward and Lucy Lowe in 1871

Marriages Dec 1864
HORTON Walter John Stourbridge 6c 308
Lowe Selina Stourbridge 6c 308
PRICE Anne Stourbridge 6c 308
PUGH Richard Stourbridge 6c 308

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =853682129


Surely it must be mistranscribed?

Still don't know which church so, I'll have to leave it there, for now.

O'k to archive :-)