Page 1 of 1
*Arc* -Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:38 pm
by Maths girl
I've got all sorts from round Old Hill area but the nearest link in I've found on BCC is with Benjamin Shakespeare (1894) who married Elsie Hackett (1895).
He was son of John Shakespeare and Mary Ann Allen while she was daughter of Tom Hackett and Ann Rebecca Crumpton.
(note from NL topic split to run with here)
Re: Hacketts
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:02 pm
by Northern Lass
I have split this post off as I am really interested to find out how Mg's Hacketts link to the ones on BCC
and I cant find a way in!
none of the following are on BCC but they must connect
Elsie Hackett b 1895 ish
father Thomas Hackett b 1864
father Josiah Hackett b 1826
father James Hackett b 1801
think that is the line Mg has
so can we find a connection to ours

we can add to this one then
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =911844548and Jimmy you got a cousin!

Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:08 pm
by peterd
allport marries davies who marry into the hacketts see allport topic

bcc
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =565236050noah allport marries elizabeth davies
DAVIES Elizabeth ALLPORT Noah 1868 Dudley, St Thomas West Midlands Dudley Register Office 204/026/375
Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:15 pm
by Northern Lass
Just been looking to see if we can link James to that lot b 1801
cant see him as a sibling for Samuel 1793
Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:19 pm
by Northern Lass
Can we find James Hackett on a census
Josiah Hackett Birth: Reddal Hill
Christening: 26 NOV 1826 Rowley Regis, Stafford,
Father: James Hackett
Mother: Prudence Hackett Extracted
anyone got the book disc handy see if there is an address in there usually is
and occup of James
Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:22 pm
by Northern Lass
There is this one could have been put down as Jas in trans and read as Joseph
maybe.... needs that one just dble checked on disc fiches
I will do it later unless anyone got them handy
submitted
Joseph HACKETT
Birth: 15 OCT 1797 Rowley Regis, Stafford, England
Christening:
Rowley Regis, Stafford, Father: Joseph HACKETT Family
Mother: Mary PARKES
Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:38 pm
by Northern Lass
Northern Lass wrote:There is this one could have been put down as Jas in trans and read as Joseph
maybe.... needs that one just dble checked on disc fiches
I will do it later unless anyone got them handy
submitted
Joseph HACKETT
Birth: 15 OCT 1797 Rowley Regis, Stafford, England
Christening:
Rowley Regis, Stafford, Father: Joseph HACKETT Family
Mother: Mary PARKES
rite that one is a Joseph most defiantely

Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:01 pm
by Northern Lass
Northern Lass wrote:Can we find James Hackett on a census
Josiah Hackett Birth: Reddal Hill
Christening: 26 NOV 1826 Rowley Regis, Stafford,
Father: James Hackett
Mother: Prudence Hackett Extracted
anyone got the book disc handy see if there is an address in there usually is
and occup of James
Ok just for the record we have in the Bishop transcripts for RR the following
26 Nov 1826 St Giles Rowley Regis
Josiah OR (this means Original registers )t/s (transcripts) Jonah s of James and Prudence Hackett Reddall Hill nailer
Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:07 pm
by Maths girl
NL
Does that mean they couldn't read it when they wrote the Bishop's copy?
No wonder we have problems
Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:15 pm
by Maths girl
I have Josiah on 1841 & 1851 Census so that is obviously what they intended.
Whole family were Nailers.
Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:39 pm
by Northern Lass
Maths girl wrote:NL
Does that mean they couldn't read it when they wrote the Bishop's copy?
No wonder we have problems
It just says that
"any significant differences between our transcription of the BT's and the transcript of the original registers have been notes as [OR t/s]"
so I understand that to mean they have the transcript of the Bishop transcripts and the Original registers transcript and compared and any differences thrown up
but a Josiah would look like a Jonah I do enough look ups to see that the Jonah could have been misread the s and I for an n
So vol 4 has got it correct they put Josiah
but because of the damage to the Rowley Regis ones it is all we have
They are worth buying if you you have a few from RRegis and very very interesting
Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:52 am
by Northern Lass
Think we need to let the tree find the answers on this one
unless anyone wishes to run with this going to archive for the mo can always bring it back to the
board with more info