Page 1 of 1

*Arc* -Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC

Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:38 pm
by Maths girl
I've got all sorts from round Old Hill area but the nearest link in I've found on BCC is with Benjamin Shakespeare (1894) who married Elsie Hackett (1895).

He was son of John Shakespeare and Mary Ann Allen while she was daughter of Tom Hackett and Ann Rebecca Crumpton.

(note from NL topic split to run with here)

Re: Hacketts

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:02 pm
by Northern Lass
I have split this post off as I am really interested to find out how Mg's Hacketts link to the ones on BCC
and I cant find a way in!
:shock:

none of the following are on BCC but they must connect

Elsie Hackett b 1895 ish
father Thomas Hackett b 1864
father Josiah Hackett b 1826
father James Hackett b 1801

think that is the line Mg has

so can we find a connection to ours :?

we can add to this one then
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =911844548

and Jimmy you got a cousin!
:grin:

Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:08 pm
by peterd
allport marries davies who marry into the hacketts see allport topic :lol:


bcc

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =565236050


noah allport marries elizabeth davies

DAVIES Elizabeth ALLPORT Noah 1868 Dudley, St Thomas West Midlands Dudley Register Office 204/026/375

Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:15 pm
by Northern Lass
Just been looking to see if we can link James to that lot b 1801
cant see him as a sibling for Samuel 1793

Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:19 pm
by Northern Lass
Can we find James Hackett on a census

Josiah Hackett Birth: Reddal Hill

Christening: 26 NOV 1826 Rowley Regis, Stafford,
Father: James Hackett
Mother: Prudence Hackett Extracted

anyone got the book disc handy see if there is an address in there usually is
and occup of James

Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:22 pm
by Northern Lass
There is this one could have been put down as Jas in trans and read as Joseph
maybe.... needs that one just dble checked on disc fiches
I will do it later unless anyone got them handy

submitted

Joseph HACKETT
Birth: 15 OCT 1797 Rowley Regis, Stafford, England

Christening:
Rowley Regis, Stafford, Father: Joseph HACKETT Family
Mother: Mary PARKES

Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:38 pm
by Northern Lass
Northern Lass wrote:There is this one could have been put down as Jas in trans and read as Joseph
maybe.... needs that one just dble checked on disc fiches
I will do it later unless anyone got them handy

submitted

Joseph HACKETT
Birth: 15 OCT 1797 Rowley Regis, Stafford, England

Christening:
Rowley Regis, Stafford, Father: Joseph HACKETT Family
Mother: Mary PARKES


rite that one is a Joseph most defiantely
:(

Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:01 pm
by Northern Lass
Northern Lass wrote:Can we find James Hackett on a census

Josiah Hackett Birth: Reddal Hill

Christening: 26 NOV 1826 Rowley Regis, Stafford,
Father: James Hackett
Mother: Prudence Hackett Extracted

anyone got the book disc handy see if there is an address in there usually is
and occup of James


Ok just for the record we have in the Bishop transcripts for RR the following
26 Nov 1826 St Giles Rowley Regis
Josiah OR (this means Original registers )t/s (transcripts) Jonah s of James and Prudence Hackett Reddall Hill nailer

Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:07 pm
by Maths girl
NL

Does that mean they couldn't read it when they wrote the Bishop's copy?

No wonder we have problems

Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:15 pm
by Maths girl
I have Josiah on 1841 & 1851 Census so that is obviously what they intended.

Whole family were Nailers.

Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:39 pm
by Northern Lass
Maths girl wrote:NL

Does that mean they couldn't read it when they wrote the Bishop's copy?

No wonder we have problems


It just says that
"any significant differences between our transcription of the BT's and the transcript of the original registers have been notes as [OR t/s]"

so I understand that to mean they have the transcript of the Bishop transcripts and the Original registers transcript and compared and any differences thrown up

but a Josiah would look like a Jonah I do enough look ups to see that the Jonah could have been misread the s and I for an n
So vol 4 has got it correct they put Josiah

but because of the damage to the Rowley Regis ones it is all we have
:(

They are worth buying if you you have a few from RRegis and very very interesting

Re: Hacketts to find a connection to on BCC

Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:52 am
by Northern Lass
Think we need to let the tree find the answers on this one

unless anyone wishes to run with this going to archive for the mo can always bring it back to the
board with more info