Page 1 of 1
Help needed reading census
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:24 pm
by MattFletcher
Can anyone decipher the added text on this 1851 census entry?

- ed51.JPG (36.76 KiB) Viewed 1690 times
It reads: Edmund Williams, Bastard Boy (crossed out with some text above it), 7, a base child
I am trying to read the text above Bastard Boy as it may give some clue as how Edmund ended up in this household.
The record can be seen here
https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKV6-GFVJ and if you have access to findmypast you can click through to see the original image.
Matt
Re: Help needed reading census
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 4:17 am
by rockyfowler
Being Moved ?
Re: Help needed reading census
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 8:20 am
by SRD
Being married?
There's no proof obviously but if his father Thomas was of the opinion that the child wasn't his he might have used the original form to voice his suspicions. The Registrar dutifully filled in the main register from the form but the Superintendent Registrar may then have struck through the entry and added his own comment after reviewing it.
Well, it's a nice story

Re: Help needed reading census
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:28 am
by MattFletcher
rockyfowler wrote:Being Moved ?
Good suggestion ... Being definitely looks correct ... Moved does too except that "Being Moved" doesn't make much sense in context

Re: Help needed reading census
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:32 am
by MattFletcher
SRD wrote:Being married?
There's no proof obviously but if his father Thomas was of the opinion that the child wasn't his he might have used the original form to voice his suspicions. The Registrar dutifully filled in the main register from the form but the Superintendent Registrar may then have struck through the entry and added his own comment after reviewing it.
You could definitely be on the right lines here. The full record shows that Edmund was born with a different surname (his mother's presumably) and location to the rest of the household. It's unclear to me whether the head, the unimaginatively named Thomas Thomas is indicated as his father. The text probably clarifies or corrects the "Bastard Boy" description in some way.