Page 1 of 1

ARC TBC..........John Raybould/Catherine Fellows

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 10:22 pm
by mallosa
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... ver=358479

I think this is him with his Parents...

1861: Club Row, Sedgley, Staffs
Thomas Raybould 54 Head Lab Upper Gornal, Staffordshire
Jane Raybould 45 Wife
John Raybould 19 Son unm Coal Miner
Thomas Raybould 14 Son unm Shoe Maker
William Raybould 11 Son
David Raybould 9 Son
(all born Upper Gornal)

1851: Paradise Row, Sedgley
Thomas Raybould 46 Head Lab
Jane Raybould 34 Wife Nailer
John H Raybould 9
Thomas Raybould 5
James Raybould 3
William Raybould 1
Richard Raybould 20 Relative unm Iron Miner
(all born Gornal, Staffs)

1841: Paradise Row, Sedgley
Thomas Raybould 30 Lab
Jane Raybould 25
Sarah Jane Raybould 2
John Henery Raybould 1 Mo
John Raybould 20 Miner
(all born in county)

next door but one are Thomas Raybould 60 and wife Hannah 65

Re: John Raybould/Catherine Fellows

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 12:48 am
by mallosa
not sure about this....

Freereg
Register type Unspecified
Register entry number 657
Marriage 14 Jun 1835 All Saints Sedgley, Staffs
Thomas RAYBOLD bachelor Sedgley
Jane RAYNOLD spinster Sedgley
Wit: James RAYBOLD/Mary Ann JONES
Notes: Groom, Bride & both Witnesses sign X

Re: John Raybould/Catherine Fellows

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 7:01 am
by Aceofbass
It seems that Catherine Fellows may be a niece of my gggrandfather Thomas Fellows.

Ancestry,co,uk has a tree (Cooper-Bennett) showing the husband of a Catherine Raybould (b. 1842 in Sedgley) as poss. Richard Raybould, b 1837 but this may not be the same Catherine.

Re: John Raybould/Catherine Fellows

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 11:42 am
by Northern Lass
mallosa wrote:not sure about this....

Freereg
Register type Unspecified
Register entry number 657
Marriage 14 Jun 1835 All Saints Sedgley, Staffs
Thomas RAYBOLD bachelor Sedgley
Jane RAYNOLD spinster Sedgley
Wit: James RAYBOLD/Mary Ann JONES
Notes: Groom, Bride & both Witnesses sign X



I have added that as a possible Mally on bcc. looks very good for it

completed?