Page 1 of 1
Raguel Parsons and mary ann Hingley
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 5:57 pm
by Northern Lass
I have done a look up and this surely cant be right
she is age 41 and he is age 25.....go girl I say!!
So I need to verify on census please
they marry in 1853 at Oldswinford
I have the marriage to put on yet
he is a nailmaker
and she is a spinster her father is William Hingley a nailmaker
can we find this couple on census in 1861? to confirm her age
then I might be able to find her on connections
Re: Raguel Parsons and mary ann Hingley
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:18 pm
by grangers14
Ok here goes!!!!
1861 Census
Cradley Road, Rowley Regis,
Rague Parsons, head, 34, Nailor, Rowley
Mary A, wife, 60, Rowley
Thomas Edwards, boarder, 37, Puddler Iron Works, Salop Bishop Castle
Michael Chew(?) boarder, 60, Umberella Maker, Cumberland eag?
Re: Raguel Parsons and mary ann Hingley
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:22 pm
by grangers14
I cant see him on a later census but a possible death
Oct-Dec 1861 6c 92 Stourbridge
Re: Raguel Parsons and mary ann Hingley
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:33 pm
by grangers14
1851 Census
Lumbans Bank, Cradley
Joseph Buffrey, head, 33, Blacksmith journeyman, Cradley
Ellen, wife, 29, Rowley
Hannah, daur, 7 (?1), Cradley
Ragu Parsons, brother in law, 22, Nailor, Rowley
Re: Raguel Parsons and mary ann Hingley
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:34 pm
by Northern Lass
Omg she is even older!
that does look like them
wonder who she is
Re: Raguel Parsons and mary ann Hingley
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:16 am
by linell
Could be this one NL. Mary Ann Ingley baptised Cradley 29.1.1797 to Wm and Dianah.
Re: Raguel Parsons and mary ann Hingley
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:26 am
by Northern Lass
linell wrote:Could be this one NL. Mary Ann Ingley baptised Cradley 29.1.1797 to Wm and Dianah.
could be...wonder if he is a nailmaker
need him on census
have we got Mary Ann Hingley prior to marriage on census
Re: Raguel Parsons and mary ann Hingley
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:14 pm
by Northern Lass
I have added this now to Black Country Connections site
she seems to be b abt 1801/1802 as I found her I believe on the 1871 widow...
and I will leave it for the moment
so for now completed with thanks