Page 1 of 1
reubin hingly b 1868--NL adding unless grangers is bored?
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 8:57 am
by Northern Lass
thought this was interesting 2 reuben hingley marriages in 1890
one reuben b 1868 or 2 of em?
any census pls
cant see reuben hingley on Bcc..
also cant see the reuben hingley marriage to Jemima on free reg prs or west mids site
can anyone find it pls anywhere full info...
Marriages Dec 1890
Hingley Reuben Stourbridge 6c 283
Horner Jemima Stourbridge 6c 283
same page as the freer and harris one
can we find some census pl for jemima and reuben in 1891 just to prove that is the correct coupling.
Re: Thomas Pearson b1797---NL sorting
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 9:00 am
by Northern Lass
This is weird there is a marriage on west mids for reuben and sarah J ane Smith
and the 1890 St John Brierley Hill marriage of Reuben Hingley and Saraha Jane Smith is on same page as
harris and Freer in 1890 diff dates
Re: reubin hingly b 1868
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 9:15 am
by Northern Lass
2nd Nov St John Brierley Hill
Reuben Hingley 22 bach Glass maker Brierley Hill Reuben Hingley Butcher
Sarah Jane Smith 19 spinster Brockmoor John Smith Engine Driver
banns
both sign
wit John Smith Sarah J Williams
Re: reubin hingly b 1868
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 9:57 am
by grangers14
I cant see them in census...
An error in Indexes?? The original of Indexes does give the same volume and page number.
Re: reubin hingly b 1868
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 10:03 am
by grangers14
Looking at Sarah Jane Smith there are 2 showing in the indexes. First one is 6c 307 the other is 6c 2-3 so looks wrong in the indexes
Sarah Jane 6c 307 married William Chamberlain.
Re: reubin hingly b 1868
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 10:51 am
by Jimmy
1891. 40 Pearson Street, Kingswinford.
Reuben Hingley 22. Glass blower.
Sarah J Hingley 19.
John Hingley 5/12. Son.
All born Brierley Hill.
Re: reubin hingly b 1868
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 11:58 am
by grangers14
Northern Lass wrote:grangers14 wrote:Looking at Sarah Jane Smith there are 2 showing in the indexes. First one is 6c 307 the other is 6c 2-3 so looks wrong in the indexes
Sarah Jane 6c 307 married William Chamberlain.
so you are saying that is wrong on free reg and should say Wm chamberlain married Jemmima horner?
cos we have the marriage of reuben and sarah Jane Smith in writing courtesy of Rf.
Free reg and RF are right. It is just that Sarah Jane has an error on the indexes with the page and volume numbers... it has 6c 2-3, it should be 3 numbers.
The other Sarah Jane Smith who married same year married a William Chamberlain.
Re: reubin hingly b 1868--NL adding unless grangers is bored
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 9:07 am
by Northern Lass
thanks grangers for adding stuff
going to lock and split this thread
and archive
completed with thanks