Page 1 of 1

ARC TBC..............George and William Attwood-

Posted: Sat May 24, 2014 10:18 pm
by sp1
This George:
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... ood-Family

and this William:
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... ood-Family

were brothers. George, it seems, really was born in Ledbury, as on later census. He was bapt same day as William (17 May 1812) at Ledbury - his baptism gives date of birth 27 Feb 1810.

I think it likely that their parents were the George and Sarah with son Joseph here:
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... ood-Family

Re: George and William Attwood

Posted: Sat May 24, 2014 10:34 pm
by sp1
It seems there were other children (from IGI - all ODM):

A twin to George, Sarah, born 27 Feb 1810, bapt 27 Feb 1810, Ledbury

Ann, bapt 30 June 1814, Cradley
Joseph, bapt 24 Mar 1816, Cradley (already on BCC)

It looks like there were some earlier ones - there is a gap, so perhaps parents were in Ledbury or elsewhere in the intervening period?

Elizabeth, bapt 14 Aug 1791, Halesowen
Nancy, born Apr 1794, bapt 18 Jan 1802, Cradley
James, bapt 14 July 1799, Cradley - this James probably also on BCC:
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... ood-Family

Re: George and William Attwood

Posted: Sun May 25, 2014 7:12 am
by Northern Lass
righto will sticky and work thru thanks sp1 :wink:

Re: George and William Attwood

Posted: Sun May 25, 2014 7:42 am
by Northern Lass
Do you think we can connect to Joseph and parents with confidence?
will add with note for now...but need more proof

anyone got the marriage for the oldswinford marriages pls
Extracted
GEORGE ATTWOOD
Marriages:
Spouse: ESTHER FRANKLIN
Marriage: 01 MAR 1835 Old Swinford, Worcester

and

Wm Attwood and Elizabeth dodd
01 Dec 1833
Oldswinford


also anything in the vicars notebooks pls re GEorge and Wm....and Joseph...and James

:?

Re: George and William Attwood

Posted: Sun May 25, 2014 8:00 am
by Northern Lass
So we are saying that poss early ones Cradley
then in Ledbury

James 1799 cradley

then Wm -George and Sarah 1810 Ledbury

then back with Joseph in 1816 :?

Re: George and William Attwood-nl adding

Posted: Sun May 25, 2014 8:41 am
by sp1
Marriage (ODM):

27 Dec 1790, Halesowen, George Attwood & Sarah Burley

This looks like the parents Linell mentions in notes for James b1799

Re: George and William Attwood

Posted: Sun May 25, 2014 9:11 am
by sp1
Northern Lass wrote:So we are saying that poss early ones Cradley
then in Ledbury

James 1799 cradley

then Wm -George and Sarah 1810 Ledbury

then back with Joseph in 1816 :?

It looks like they had Elizabeth, Nancy and James in Cradley (the 6 year gap between Nancy and James possibly explained by a stillbirth or miscarriage) then disappear somewhere, turn up in Ledbury where 3 children born, then return to Cradley to have 2 more children.
Did George or Sarah make it to 1841 census?
There is a possible bapt for George 1762 in Halesowen, s of William & Elizabeth (There are other children for this couple).
One other bapt in Halesowen for a George (father Mathias - they are on BCC, and that George didn't marry) but too late for the marriage to Sarah Burley.

Re: George and William Attwood-nl adding

Posted: Sun May 25, 2014 9:17 am
by sp1
Possible bapt for Sarah Burley (the only one!):
30 Apr 1769, Halesowen, Sarah d of Richard & Ann Burley

Re: George and William Attwood-nl adding

Posted: Sun May 25, 2014 10:31 pm
by sp1
What you have added looks fine Jan, but think you need to amend year of birth for George Senior (he wouldn't have been nine when James was born!) - still think he is the one born 1762, and m Sarah Burley: does Linell have anything more?

Re: George and William Attwood-nl adding

Posted: Mon May 26, 2014 7:06 am
by linell
Yes I too think George Married Sarah Burley in Halesowen 1790, could not prove it though. I do have a picture of James Attwood as a very old man. Jan this connects to Nigel Brown he may have more detail. Linell

Re: George and William Attwood-nl adding

Posted: Mon May 26, 2014 7:41 am
by Northern Lass
Have amended the birth and added in marriage thanks guys
:grin:
Ok to archive?