Genealogy Forum UK

James Hackett - http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... ett-Family

Emma Partridge - http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... dge-Family

Poss Marriage 1888
HACKETT James PARTRIDGE Emma Halesowen, St John the Baptist Dudley Register Office 014/005/478

1891: Barracks Yard, Birmingham Street, Halesowen
James Hackett 27 Head Blacksmith/Striker
Emma Hackett 27 Wife Nailmaker
Sarah Hackett 2 Dau
Charles Hackett 10 mths
(all born Halesowen)

...Her parents Charles & Mary are living next door

12 Feb 1888 St John The Baptist Halesowen
James HACKETT 20 B Labourer Birmingham Street Borough No information on father (Blank)
Emma PARTRIDGE 23 S Nailmaker Birmingham Street Borough Father Charles Partridge Nail Maker
After Banns The X Of Both
Wit; George Willetts X / Sarah Ann Hinckley

Thankyou RF

mallosa wrote:1891: Barracks Yard, Birmingham Street, Halesowen
James Hackett 27 Head Blacksmith/Striker
Emma Hackett 27 Wife Nailmaker
Sarah Hackett 2 Dau
Charles Hackett 10 mths
(all born Halesowen)

...Her parents Charles & Mary are living next door

His age on Marriage doesn't fit with the census....

1911: 11 Birmingham Street, Halesowen
James Hackett 46 Gen Lab Excavating - married 22 yrs - children: 6/5/1
Emma Hackett 47
Charles Hackett 20 Son S Tube Screwer
George Hackett 18 Son S Steel Bar Packer
William Hackett 14 Son Gen Lab

May be his age is 26 on marriage?
Im sure RF will check for you or may be just a mistake?

1901. Birmingham Street, Halesowen
James Hackett, head, 36, working ? ? Work
Emma, wife, 37, Nail Maker
Sarah, daur, 12,
Charles, 10,
George, son, 8,
William, son, 4
All born Halesowen

Thanks Jo, I've added him separately for now but will ask for it to be re-checked to be on the safe side

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... ket-Family

Age is deffo aged 20 on marriage doc Mally I have rechecked it.

so must be anothe James Hackett
The marriage looks ok I think ...........maybe just age was put down incorrectly on certif

go with census age I think for now I will amend