Riots in London

A place for general and off-topic chat amongst researchers. Please ensure that all posts remain suitable for a family audience.

Moderators: admin, Northern Lass, peterd

User avatar
Annie
Posts: 4093
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:40 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Griffiths,Faulkner, Edwards, Garbett,Green, Lee, Martin,Jones, Smith, Poole
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Saffordshire, Flintshire,Yorkshir, Lancashire Middlesex, Cheshire

Re: Riots in London

Post by Annie »

Just tried again and they have this message posted on page,

The e-petitions site is having problems at the moment. We need to temporarily suspend the creation and signing of e-petitions to allow us to make sure everything is working properly for you.We aim to re-open the e-petitions site by Friday morning (12th August).

We're very sorry for the inconvenience this causes you.

The e-petition entitled "Convicted London rioters should loose all benefits" has now passed the threshold of 100,000 signatures and has been passed to the Backbench Business Committee to consider for debate. It will continue to be available for signature once the site is re-opened.

So I will try again tomorrow.

Annie
User avatar
Lulu
Posts: 535
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:39 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Hadley Tromans Ruston Kite Harper Clift Smart
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Black Country

Re: Riots in London

Post by Lulu »

linell wrote:
SRD wrote:
Lulu wrote:Funny thing is, it was raining in Manchester earlier today and it all went quiet. Perhaps they forgot to nick any brollies? :lol:
They were all indoors watching their nicked tellies.


I don't think so, most of them (750 yesterday) are either on remand or going through the Court System, some Courts have been operating through the night, other criminals are in hiding, waiting for the Police to come knocking.

Linell.

But they have been identified, in the main from CCTV footage, they were on the streets committing their crimes before the rain came. I don't agree with this Policing after the event. What they should be doing is stopping these crimes, not arresting people the day after they commit offences.
Just because you're Paranoid, it doesn't mean to say they're not out to get you.
User avatar
grangers14
Posts: 15641
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:50 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Shaw, Round, Lawrence, Wain
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Midlands, North East
Location: North East

Re: Riots in London

Post by grangers14 »

Agree Lulu but the amount of trouble that was going on there just isnt enough Police to stop and arrest at the time.
Next best thing is to arrest them as soon as possible afterwards.

I find it shocking and my kids and their friends who come here find it shocking too. Sad and I feel so sorry for all the innocent people involved. They just have respect.
Jo :)
User avatar
Jimmy
Posts: 22696
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:40 am
Primary Surname Interests: Ancestry
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Worcestershire, Staffordshire.
Location: Kidderminster.

Re: Riots in London

Post by Jimmy »

Annie wrote:Just tried again and they have this message posted on page,

The e-petitions site is having problems at the moment. We need to temporarily suspend the creation and signing of e-petitions to allow us to make sure everything is working properly for you.We aim to re-open the e-petitions site by Friday morning (12th August).

We're very sorry for the inconvenience this causes you.

The e-petition entitled "Convicted London rioters should loose all benefits" has now passed the threshold of 100,000 signatures and has been passed to the Backbench Business Committee to consider for debate. It will continue to be available for signature once the site is re-opened.

So I will try again tomorrow.

Annie


I think you will find it is now working. Number of signatures: 106,613.
User avatar
grangers14
Posts: 15641
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:50 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Shaw, Round, Lawrence, Wain
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Midlands, North East
Location: North East

Re: Riots in London

Post by grangers14 »

I just got on ok.

Only thing is it says for London and it should be all areas!
Jo :)
User avatar
Annie
Posts: 4093
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:40 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Griffiths,Faulkner, Edwards, Garbett,Green, Lee, Martin,Jones, Smith, Poole
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Saffordshire, Flintshire,Yorkshir, Lancashire Middlesex, Cheshire

Re: Riots in London

Post by Annie »

grangers14 wrote:I just got on ok.

Only thing is it says for London and it should be all areas!
Jo :)



I just signed, and agree Jo it should say area's.

Annie
User avatar
snoopysue
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:12 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Fellows Jinks Wearing Jeavons Jensen Barker Skidmore Beardmore Woodall
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Staffordshire, Worcestershire, Warwickshire, Denmark
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: Riots in London

Post by snoopysue »

They've been reporting on the sentences given out, especially those where the convicted person doesn't think he's commited a crime. In the one case he hadn't knicked anything, but was found in a department store and admitted intent to steal. The other case was two lads who'd incited to riot in Warrington and Northwich through facebook, but it luckily hadn't amounted to anything.

As far as I'm concerned these people are just as guilty as if the theft/riot had actually happened. They're right to throw the book at them!
Snoopysue

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
Post Reply

Return to “The Snug”