Page 4 of 4
Re: Somat aint rite here........Mary Ann Lowe/Poole/Kibler /
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:09 pm
by Jimmy
Jimmy wrote:1871. Blackheath.
William Poole 32. Rivet maker.
Mary A Poole 30.
Richard Hughes 15. Boarder.
This fits with the above.
Deaths Jun 1877.
Poole William. 37. Dudley. 6c. 3.
West Midlands Death 1877.
POOLE William, Rowley Regis, Sandwell Register Office, RR/35/78.
Re: Somat aint rite here........Mary Ann Lowe/Poole/Kibler /
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:09 pm
by Northern Lass
Ok I have now got Joseph Lowe and Mary Ann Unknown here
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =597549198and Mary Ann Kibbler here
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =103502789Does that look ok?
Shall we open a topic on both now and lock this one and use as ref?
We could do with running with who the Mary Ann Unknown is
and
why Mary Anns daus marriages have father John Poole and Mary Ann Poole as the father on marriage
Re: Somat aint rite here........Mary Ann Lowe/Poole/Kibler /
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:13 pm
by Northern Lass
Jimmy wrote:Jimmy wrote:1871. Blackheath.
William Poole 32. Rivet maker.
Mary A Poole 30.
Richard Hughes 15. Boarder.
This fits with the above.
Deaths Jun 1877.
Poole William. 37. Dudley. 6c. 3.
West Midlands Death 1877.
POOLE William, Rowley Regis, Sandwell Register Office, RR/35/78.
that must be a different William Poole cos she marries in 1871 Dec qtr
Marriages Dec 1871
Edwards Joseph Stourbridge 6c 328
Homer Sarah Stourbridge 6c 328
Kibbler Mary Ann Stourbridge 6c 328
Poole William Stourbridge 6c 328
Re: Somat aint rite here........Mary Ann Lowe/Poole/Kibler /
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:17 pm
by Northern Lass
Or that is our May Ann Kibler with her husband to be?
but why are the kids with diff father on marriage for Sarah Jane
and no father on Hannahs
if he dies in 1877 cos they born before
Re: Somat aint rite here........Mary Ann Lowe/Poole/Kibler /
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:21 pm
by Jimmy
This fits with being Samuel Taylors wife in 1871.
Deaths Mar 1879.
Taylor Mary Ann. 43. Dudley. 6c. 13.
Re: Somat aint rite here........Mary Ann Lowe/Poole/Kibler /
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:40 pm
by Northern Lass
So what are we saying cos I have lost this now
in 1871 Samuel is with a Mary Ann which may or may not be a Mary Ann lowe or another
need a marriage
and she dies in 1879
so we can add that for Samuel yes?
Re: Somat aint rite here........Mary Ann Lowe/Poole/Kibler /
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:41 pm
by Northern Lass
Andthat 1871 mary be our Mary ann Kimble with Wm poole ahead of marriage
living together as man and wife?

Re: Somat aint rite here........Mary Ann Lowe/Poole/Kibler /
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:43 pm
by Jimmy
I can go with that.
Re: Somat aint rite here........Mary Ann Lowe/Poole/Kibler /
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:12 pm
by Northern Lass
Ok going to lock this now and leave for ref
Re: Somat aint rite here........Mary Ann Lowe/Poole/Kibler /
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 7:21 pm
by Northern Lass
Thanks so much for all this I think we have more or less sorted her out
so will now archive this
