Re: Loines/loins/loyns/lines etc
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2015 4:15 pm
Hi, I have emailed the records office in the vain hope that some kind soul could will confirm that the Death Register is extant and
where it is, given the boundary change in the same decade. I have asked if they could confirm the date of death reported.
There is no point getting another copy as clearly there has only been a difference in the interpretation of the age at death on
the facsimile.
We are faced with the possibility that the informant guessed the age,however Amphlett maintains the gravestone said 65.
However that could have been an approximation by the next of kin too?
I do know that a lot of the family had left the Clent area in the mid 19th century, some to West Bromwich then to Lancashire.
If I hear from the records office I will get back.
Meantime old Elizabeth Boughton nee Lines was 65 in 1843 until someone persuades me otherwise. One has to keep an open mind
though!
K
where it is, given the boundary change in the same decade. I have asked if they could confirm the date of death reported.
There is no point getting another copy as clearly there has only been a difference in the interpretation of the age at death on
the facsimile.
We are faced with the possibility that the informant guessed the age,however Amphlett maintains the gravestone said 65.
However that could have been an approximation by the next of kin too?
I do know that a lot of the family had left the Clent area in the mid 19th century, some to West Bromwich then to Lancashire.
If I hear from the records office I will get back.
Meantime old Elizabeth Boughton nee Lines was 65 in 1843 until someone persuades me otherwise. One has to keep an open mind
though!
K