Genealogy Forum UK

The tree, and others, says that Nancy & William's parents are William Hartill (13 May 1770, Upper Gornal to 19 Aug 1825 in Sedgley, Staffordshire, England) and Mary Flavell (b. 7 Jan 1770 in Sedgley, Staffordshire, England).

It says that the children are:
William Hartill 1785 - 1851
NOT NAMED HARTILL 1792 -
William Hartill 1794 - 1794
Esther Hartill 1795 - 1793
Sarah Hartill 1795 - 1799
William Hartill 1799 - 1861
Nancy Hartill 1803 - 1884
John Hartill 1806 - 1861
Mary Hartill 1809 - 1874
Pheobe Hartill 1813 - 1891
Richard Hartill 1823 - 1893

I've got a feeling I've come across the Flavell connection before on ancestry, but I couldn't confirm it, so I haven't added it to my tree. If I remember correctly I contacted one of the people on who's tree I'd seen the info, but never got a reply!!

dianel wrote:The tree, and others, says that Nancy & William's parents are William Hartill (13 May 1770, Upper Gornal to 19 Aug 1825 in Sedgley, Staffordshire, England) and Mary Flavell (b. 7 Jan 1770 in Sedgley, Staffordshire, England).

It says that the children are:
William Hartill 1785 - 1851
NOT NAMED HARTILL 1792 -
William Hartill 1794 - 1794
Esther Hartill 1795 - 1793
Sarah Hartill 1795 - 1799
William Hartill 1799 - 1861
Nancy Hartill 1803 - 1884
John Hartill 1806 - 1861
Mary Hartill 1809 - 1874
Pheobe Hartill 1813 - 1891
Richard Hartill 1823 - 1893

Strange with three Williams!! Especially as the first one didn't die until after the two others were born!! It looks like it could be the old ancestry problem of copying from other people's trees willy nilly!!

Iv'e added Hannah as Ezra's spouse as well as their kids. I've not connected Emma Bennett to Joseph and Hannah Bennett, but added a note that they are possible parents.

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... ill-Family

Let me know when you want this archived and I will move it

I'm not sure whether to add Emma Bennett under Joseph and Hannah with a note to say she might be the same as the one married to Isaiah Bradley, or whether to not to add her, but add a note under possible parents. As there's no father on marriage cert, difficult to know whether we're correct in our assumptions that she's the sister of Hannah Bennett (b. 1828). My gut feeling is that we're on the right track!

snoopysue wrote:I'm not sure whether to add Emma Bennett under Joseph and Hannah with a note to say she might be the same as the one married to Isaiah Bradley, or whether to not to add her, but add a note under possible parents. As there's no father on marriage cert, difficult to know whether we're correct in our assumptions that she's the sister of Hannah Bennett (b. 1828). My gut feeling is that we're on the right track!

you could add a note to her notes with your reasoning

Northern Lass wrote:

snoopysue wrote:I'm not sure whether to add Emma Bennett under Joseph and Hannah with a note to say she might be the same as the one married to Isaiah Bradley, or whether to not to add her, but add a note under possible parents. As there's no father on marriage cert, difficult to know whether we're correct in our assumptions that she's the sister of Hannah Bennett (b. 1828). My gut feeling is that we're on the right track!

you could add a note to her notes with your reasoning

Sounds like a good idea to me, just got to formulate myself in an understandable and succinct manner!!!

Okay, added here:

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/fa ... ett-Family

Ready to archive