Genealogy Forum UK

I have this marriage but have no idea where it came from? Maybe you can tell......
KIRK Thomas E RICE Jane 1910 West Derby, Register Office or Registrar Attended Lancashire Liverpool REG_WD/264/141

As Jane was born in 1877 she would have been 33 when she married Thomas which is quite late isnt it? Maybe the year is a mistake and should have been 1901 instead of 1910 which would make her 24 the 1911 census correct
It does look like thats her in 1911

I have the marriage certificate for her daughter, Phyllis Lubeck and one of the witnesses was A Kirk Possibly Alexander?

From here.

http://www.lancashirebmd.org.uk/

Jimmy wrote:Lancashire Marriage indexes for the years: 1910,
RICE Jane. KIRK Thomas E. West Derby, Register Office or Registrar Attended. Liverpool REG_WD/264/141.

Probably told a porkie on census.

Name missing on Freebmd.
Marriages Dec 1910.
Jones Robert. W. Derby. 8b. 835.
Kirk Thomas E. W.Derby. 8b. 835.
Morris Gertrude A. W Derby 8b. 835.
Potts Malcolm. W Derby. 8b. 835.
Wilson Emilia. W.Derby. 8b. 835.

Could be three names missing

Mary Boyd Oct-Nov-Dec 1910 Oct-Nov-Dec West Derby Lancashire
Thomas Leatherbarrow Oct-Nov-Dec 1910 Oct-Nov-Dec West Derby Lancashire
Jane Rice Oct-Nov-Dec 1910 Oct-Nov-Dec West Derby Lancashire -- original could be 835 for this one

Thomas in 1901 & 1891

1901 101, Farnworth Street, West Derby
FOWLER, Thomas H Head Married M 57 1844 Paperhanger & Painter Chatham Kent
FOWLER, Sarah Wife Married F 58 1843 Sherbourne Dorsetshire
KIRK, Thomas Boarder Single M 31 1870 Joiner Scotland

1891 7, Baker Street, Everton, Liverpool
JONES, Martha Head Widow F 59 1832 Housekeeper Moreton Cheshire
EDWARDS, Mary Lodger Single F 71 1820 Retired Housekeeper Liverpool Lancashire
WILLIAMS, Thomas S Lodger Single M 23 1868 Stockbrokers Clerk Liverpool Lancashire
KIRK, Thomas Lodger Single M 22 1869 Joiner Scotland
CARRUTHERS, Robert Lodger Single M 22 1869 Joiner Scotland
SEAGER, George Lodger Single M 17 1874 Fruit Merchants Clerk Liverpool Lancashire

I didnt think of that! As the marriage is registered as 1910 on 2 different records that does make more sense
Thanksfor the censuses for Thomas as well

Moving to General Discussion

Hi yerffej
Are you still working on this or can it be archived?

Jo