Re: Francis Hadley
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:17 am
Hang on theres something in a muddle here
Jo
Jo
If that marriage is right then George would be born 1875?
Our George is 1865.
Genealogy Forum UK
A web forum for the discussion of UK genealogy and family history research.
https://www.genealogyforum.co.uk/forum/
*Archive?* Francis Hadley
Page 2 of 2
Re: Francis Hadley
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:19 am
Re: Francis Hadley
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:22 am
It must just be a typing error, it should be 1885 and its the right address.
Jo
Jo
Re: Francis Hadley
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:30 am
grangers14 wrote:It must just be a typing error, it should be 1885 and its the right address.
Jo
Yes - it's a typo - should be 1885 - soz
Re: *Marriage looked up* ---Francis Hadley
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:31 am
Maths girl wrote:Possible
1891 39, High Street, Rowley Regis, Blackheath
HADLEY, Thomas Head Married M 42 1849 Boat Loader At Colliery Rowley Regis Staffordshire
HADLEY, Sarah Wife Married F 40 1851 Rowley Regis Staffordshire
HADLEY, David Son Single M 17 1874 Rivet Maker Rowley Regis Staffordshire
HADLEY, George Son M 15 1876 Tube Screwer Rowley Regis Staffordshire
HADLEY, Phoebe Daughter F 13 1878 Scholar Rowley Regis Staffordshire
HADLEY, Walter Son M 10 1881 Scholar Rowley Regis Staffordshire
HADLEY, William Son M 6 1885 Scholar Rowley Regis Staffordshire
HADLEY, Richard Son M 4 1887 Scholar Rowley Regis Staffordshire
1881 39, High St, Rowley Regis
HADLEY, Thomas Head Married M 32 1849 Gen Lab Rowley Regis Staffordshire
HADLEY, Sarah A Wife Married F 30 1851 Nailer Rowley Regis Staffordshire
HADLEY, David Son Single M 8 1873 Scholar Rowley Regis Staffordshire
HADLEY, George Son Single M 5 1876 Scholar Rowley Regis Staffordshire
HADLEY, Phoebe Daughter Single F 3 1878 Rowley Regis Staffordshire
HADLEY, Walter Son Single M 0 1881 Rowley Regis Staffordshire
Not this lot== Just found them in 1901 and George is married to a Mary !!!
This George is still at home with parents in 1901, married to a Mary.
Re: Francis Hadley
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:32 am
Antie Em wrote:grangers14 wrote:It must just be a typing error, it should be 1885 and its the right address.
Jo
Yes - it's a typo - should be 1885 - soz
Its ok have changed it now.
Jo
Re: Francis Hadley
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:38 am
1861. Northfield Road, Dudley
Thomas Hadley, head, 29, Coal Miner
Mary, wife, 20,
Emma, daur, 8,
James, son, 7,
Sarah Jane, daur, 2,
All born Dudley
Next door is
John Hadley, head, 53, Iron Puddler, Tipton
Mary, wife, 48, Dudley
Phillip, son, 13,
Mary, daur, 10,
Timothy, son, 7,
All others born Rowley
Thomas Hadley, head, 29, Coal Miner
Mary, wife, 20,
Emma, daur, 8,
James, son, 7,
Sarah Jane, daur, 2,
All born Dudley
Next door is
John Hadley, head, 53, Iron Puddler, Tipton
Mary, wife, 48, Dudley
Phillip, son, 13,
Mary, daur, 10,
Timothy, son, 7,
All others born Rowley
Re: Francis Hadley
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:49 am
West Midlands Marriage indexes for the years: 1851
HADLEY Thomas NOCK Mary A Dudley, St Thomas Dudley Register Office 204/010/474
1851. Primrose Hill, Dudley
James Nock, head, 51?Nail Maker
Lucy, wife, 51,
Mary A Hadley, daur, M, 20, Nail maker
Lucy Nock, daur, 16, Nail maker
James, son, 12,
Noble, son, M, 27, Coal Miner
Emma, daur, 25, Kingswinford
Elizabeth, daur, 2 months?
Thomas, Hadley, 20, Coal Miner
All others born Dudley
HADLEY Thomas NOCK Mary A Dudley, St Thomas Dudley Register Office 204/010/474
1851. Primrose Hill, Dudley
James Nock, head, 51?Nail Maker
Lucy, wife, 51,
Mary A Hadley, daur, M, 20, Nail maker
Lucy Nock, daur, 16, Nail maker
James, son, 12,
Noble, son, M, 27, Coal Miner
Emma, daur, 25, Kingswinford
Elizabeth, daur, 2 months?
Thomas, Hadley, 20, Coal Miner
All others born Dudley
Re: Francis Hadley
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 11:40 am
1841. Primrose, Dudley
James Nock, 40, Nailer
Lucy, 40,
Noble, 16,
Mary, 9,
Lucy, 6,
James, 3
beta family search
James Nock
England Marriages, 1538-1973
spouse: Lucy Wall
marriage: 24 Sep 1821 - St. Thomas, Dudley, Worcester, England
record title: England Marriages, 1538-1973
groom's name: James Nock
bride's name: Lucy Wall
marriage date: 24 Sep 1821
marriage place: St. Thomas, Dudley, Worcester, England
groom's marital status: Single
bride's marital status: Single
indexing project (batch) number: M01066-8
system origin: England-EASy
source film number: 350496
James Nock, 40, Nailer
Lucy, 40,
Noble, 16,
Mary, 9,
Lucy, 6,
James, 3
beta family search
James Nock
England Marriages, 1538-1973
spouse: Lucy Wall
marriage: 24 Sep 1821 - St. Thomas, Dudley, Worcester, England
record title: England Marriages, 1538-1973
groom's name: James Nock
bride's name: Lucy Wall
marriage date: 24 Sep 1821
marriage place: St. Thomas, Dudley, Worcester, England
groom's marital status: Single
bride's marital status: Single
indexing project (batch) number: M01066-8
system origin: England-EASy
source film number: 350496
Re: Francis Hadley
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:23 pm
Added census and children
Thomas Hadley
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... i=76217506
James Nock, I havent added Elizabeth aged 2 months, I think it may be grand daur?
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =394124940
Marriages added for look up.
Can archive pending look ups I think.
Jo
Thomas Hadley
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... i=76217506
James Nock, I havent added Elizabeth aged 2 months, I think it may be grand daur?
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =394124940
Marriages added for look up.
Can archive pending look ups I think.
Jo