Page 2 of 2
Re: Benjamin Hackett (1806/1808)
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:21 am
by chrisg
Northern Lass wrote:if he was christened/born 1809 he cant have been buried in 1807
need to check that bapt out on RR disc
Slight typo - 1810 July 3
Re: Benjamin Hackett (1806/1808)
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:04 am
by grangers14
1871. Lawrence Lane.
Benjamen Hacket 64. Widow.
Jesse Hacket 19. Nephew.
Thomas Hacket 16. Nephew.
Geri Hacket 13. Nephew.
John Mallen 24. Boarder.
Harriet Hacket 22. Boarder.
Joseph Mallen 2. Grandson.
and do we have him on the 1841 benjamin pls
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... d=85501234
Transcribed as Hacke
1841. Wilks Fold, Rowley regis.
Benjamin Hacket, 30
Sarah, 25, Not born County
Mary, 5,
Sarah, 4,
Hannah, 70,
All others born in County
Re: Benjamin Hackett (1806/1808)
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:49 am
by Northern Lass
chrisg wrote:Northern Lass wrote:if he was christened/born 1809 he cant have been buried in 1807
need to check that bapt out on RR disc
Slight typo - 1810 July 3
Ok so that strengthens the fact ours is the correct one
Chris do you fancy adding a note on Benjamins (our bens) notes that it is not the one born 1809 as he died etc etc
and Jo do you fancy adding that 1841 to Benjamins notes pls
then we can archive this one
although I would like to know about those other nephews if poss.....
Re: Benjamin Hackett (1806/1808)
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 10:01 am
by grangers14
Added the census.
Jo
Re: Benjamin Hackett (1806/1808)
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 10:06 am
by Northern Lass
Thanks Jo
I am flagging to archive this now later today
