Page 2 of 2

Re: UPDATE--William Stevens b

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:37 pm
by rockyfowler
STEPHENS, George Head Married M 26 1835 Chain Maker
Dudley
Worcestershire
STEPHENS, Mary Wife Married F 26 1835 Chain Maker
Netherton
Worcestershire
STEPHENS, William Son M 5 1856
Dudley Wood
Worcestershire
STEPHENS, Henry Son M 2 1859
Address:
Reddal Hill, Rowley Regis County:- 1861
Staffordshire

Re: UPDATE--William Stevens b

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:39 pm
by rockyfowler
STEVANS, George Head M 36 1835 Worcestershire
STEVANS, Mary Wife F 36 1835 Worcestershire
STEVANS, William Son M 15 1856 Staffordshire
STEVANS, Henry Son M 12 1859 Staffordshire
STEVANS, James Son M 10 1861 Staffordshire
STEVANS, Joseph Son M 6 1865 Staffordshire
STEVANS, Sarah J Daughter F 2 1869 Staffordshire
Address:
Reddall Hill, Rowley Regis County: 1871
Staffordshire

Re: UPDATE--William Stevens b

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:47 pm
by rockyfowler
poss mar STEVENS George MYE Mary Dudley, St Thomas Dudley Register Office 204/014/240 1854

Re: UPDATE--William Stevens b

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:50 pm
by Northern Lass
rockyfowler wrote:STEVANS, George Head M 36 1835 Worcestershire
STEVANS, Mary Wife F 36 1835 Worcestershire
STEVANS, William Son M 15 1856 Staffordshire
STEVANS, Henry Son M 12 1859 Staffordshire
STEVANS, James Son M 10 1861 Staffordshire
STEVANS, Joseph Son M 6 1865 Staffordshire
STEVANS, Sarah J Daughter F 2 1869 Staffordshire
Address:
Reddall Hill, Rowley Regis County: 1871
Staffordshire


thanks RF what are the occups of George and William on that 1871 pls

Re: UPDATE--William Stevens b

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:57 pm
by rockyfowler
george- william and henry chain makers

Re: UPDATE--William Stevens b

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:02 pm
by Northern Lass
Thanks RF :grin:

Re: UPDATE--William Stevens b

Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:52 am
by Northern Lass
Don't know on this lot

looks good but need more evidence
what do we think?

Re: UPDATE--William Stevens b

Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:47 pm
by Northern Lass
rite not convinced on this one so
flagging to archive

it may be the rite one but ...... :?

can always run with it again....cos they aint going anywhere