Genealogy Forum UK

nice one

Hannah 1 is deffinatley my Hannah mother to Caroline

Hannah 2 is a possibility, will have to get the marriage cert to confirm this

Could be that my Hannah dies between Oct 1855-1859 and Elijah marry's again, this would explain the Glase.

thanks again all

Think that looks good Di
the marriage will show father
I too think we have 2 Hannahs
there is a death in West Brom Jun qtr Hannah Barnes 1859
then that marriage is 1859 Dec qtr
they didnt waste much time these blokes


shall we archive pend look up or cert info?

Possibilities:

1857,BARNES Hannah Tipton Sandwell Register Office TIP/24/38

1859,BARNES Hannah M Tipton Sandwell Register Office TIP/27/78
1859,BARNES Hannah West Bromwich North East Sandwell Register Office WBNE/18/156

Using the FreeBMD might find the quarters these deaths took place in and that could eliminate one or both of the 1859 ones.
The I think it is a case of getting the certificates unless there are burial details for them that give sufficient info to confirm family connections.

In 1861 as they are living in West Brom it would prob be the West Brom one
Tipton is Sedgley/Dudley area
(under Staffs on the census- but between Sedgley and Dudley) well it is when I go to the archives


I think that marriage look up will save the need to get a cert
I bet she is that Whitehouse one

Trace back on the 1851 that Thomas Glase son age 12 was it?

Northern Lass wrote:In 1861 as they are living in West Brom it would prob be the West Brom one
Tipton is Sedgley/Dudley area
(under Staffs on the census- but between Sedgley and Dudley) well it is when I go to the archives


I think that marriage look up will save the need to get a cert
I bet she is that Whitehouse one

Trace back on the 1851 that Thomas Glase son age 12 was it?

try this site in the links

http://www.users.waitrose.com/~whitehousefhc/

yeah archive this NL, and i shall keep everyone informed when confirmation comes through.

they didnt waste much time these blokes

Supose in the 1800 era they did'nt really get to know someone before marrying, or they just did not want to be by them selves aww

dianepearson79 wrote:yeah archive this NL, and i shall keep everyone informed when confirmation comes through.

they didnt waste much time these blokes

Supose in the 1800 era they did'nt really get to know someone before marrying, or they just did not want to be by them selves aww

bit like speed dating


I feel a topic coming on in the snug

ok will archive
lets us know how you get on